Add to ORKGAcademics today have to publish to succeed. In Publish or Perish: Perceived Benefits versus Unintended Consequences, Imad A. Moosa assesses the disastrous consequences of this view for academics, both personally and academically. Review by James Hartley
As part of Academic Book Week 2018, last week Springer Nature hosted an event exploring open access ...
In this feature essay, David Beer argues that reviewing allows us to put collective knowledge ahead ...
Improving scientific publishing is often framed as an issue of openness and speed and less often as ...
The phrase ‘publish or perish’ suggests that the purpose of academic writing is in and of itself to ...
One of the proposed advantages of open access publication is that it increases the impact of academi...
Drawing on findings from one of the largest surveys of its kind to date, Mithu Lucraft demonstrates ...
In disciplines where the academic book is the primary means for communicating research and establish...
In a recent Impact Blog post, Jørgen Carling outlined the reasons why he feels the PhD by publicatio...
To many authors, the point of publication can feel like the culmination of a process; the moment one...
A recent investigation led by an international group of journalists raised concerns over the scale o...
In The Origin of Others, Pulitzer Prize-winning author and recipient of the Nobel Prize in Literatur...
Professor Fleur Johns offers 10 rules of thumb that have guided her own reviewing efforts and may pr...
The literature review is a staple of the scholarly article. It allows authors to summarise previous ...
Justin Gest author of Mass Appeal: Communicating Policy Ideas in Multiple Media asks why not publish...
In Book Wars: The Digital Revolution in Publishing, John B. Thompson explores the digital transforma...
As part of Academic Book Week 2018, last week Springer Nature hosted an event exploring open access ...
In this feature essay, David Beer argues that reviewing allows us to put collective knowledge ahead ...
Improving scientific publishing is often framed as an issue of openness and speed and less often as ...
The phrase ‘publish or perish’ suggests that the purpose of academic writing is in and of itself to ...
One of the proposed advantages of open access publication is that it increases the impact of academi...
Drawing on findings from one of the largest surveys of its kind to date, Mithu Lucraft demonstrates ...
In disciplines where the academic book is the primary means for communicating research and establish...
In a recent Impact Blog post, Jørgen Carling outlined the reasons why he feels the PhD by publicatio...
To many authors, the point of publication can feel like the culmination of a process; the moment one...
A recent investigation led by an international group of journalists raised concerns over the scale o...
In The Origin of Others, Pulitzer Prize-winning author and recipient of the Nobel Prize in Literatur...
Professor Fleur Johns offers 10 rules of thumb that have guided her own reviewing efforts and may pr...
The literature review is a staple of the scholarly article. It allows authors to summarise previous ...
Justin Gest author of Mass Appeal: Communicating Policy Ideas in Multiple Media asks why not publish...
In Book Wars: The Digital Revolution in Publishing, John B. Thompson explores the digital transforma...
As part of Academic Book Week 2018, last week Springer Nature hosted an event exploring open access ...
In this feature essay, David Beer argues that reviewing allows us to put collective knowledge ahead ...
Improving scientific publishing is often framed as an issue of openness and speed and less often as ...