In this paper we attempt to reply to the thoughtful comments made on our book, Responsible Brains, by a stellar group of scholars. Our reply focuses on two topics discussed in the commenting papers: frst, the issue of responsibility for negligent behavior; and second, the broad claim that facts about brain function are normatively inert. In response to worries that our theory lacks normative implications, we will concentrate on an area where our theory has clear relevance to law and legal policy: juvenile responsibility
In a 2002 editorial published in The Economist, the following warning was given: Genetics may yet t...
This chapter is a submission to the Oxford Handbook of Law and the Regulation of Technology edited b...
# The Author(s) 2009. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Could ...
In this paper we attempt to reply to the thoughtful comments made on our book, Responsible Brains, b...
[This download includes the table of contents and chapter 1.] When we praise, b...
In the contemporary debate on the use of the neurosciences in ethics and law, numerous arguments hav...
It is a common idea, and an element in many legal systems, that people can deserve punishment when t...
This article addresses the law\u27s concept of the person and its relation to responsibility and the...
In Responsible Brains (MIT Press, 2018), Hirstein, Sifferd and Fagan apply the language of cognitive...
In the field of 'neurolaw', reformists claim that recent scientific discoveries from the mind scienc...
Could neuroimaging evidence help us to assess the degree of a person’s responsibility for a crime wh...
Abstract The way in which we characterize the structural and functional differences between psycho-p...
Contains responses to comments by Chang, Hestein and Heuer on From Normativity to Responsibility . ...
Abstract. Durable laws of social behavior are possible in principle even if they are very difficult ...
This work is focused on two related questions. First, why does youth diminish moral responsibility f...
In a 2002 editorial published in The Economist, the following warning was given: Genetics may yet t...
This chapter is a submission to the Oxford Handbook of Law and the Regulation of Technology edited b...
# The Author(s) 2009. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Could ...
In this paper we attempt to reply to the thoughtful comments made on our book, Responsible Brains, b...
[This download includes the table of contents and chapter 1.] When we praise, b...
In the contemporary debate on the use of the neurosciences in ethics and law, numerous arguments hav...
It is a common idea, and an element in many legal systems, that people can deserve punishment when t...
This article addresses the law\u27s concept of the person and its relation to responsibility and the...
In Responsible Brains (MIT Press, 2018), Hirstein, Sifferd and Fagan apply the language of cognitive...
In the field of 'neurolaw', reformists claim that recent scientific discoveries from the mind scienc...
Could neuroimaging evidence help us to assess the degree of a person’s responsibility for a crime wh...
Abstract The way in which we characterize the structural and functional differences between psycho-p...
Contains responses to comments by Chang, Hestein and Heuer on From Normativity to Responsibility . ...
Abstract. Durable laws of social behavior are possible in principle even if they are very difficult ...
This work is focused on two related questions. First, why does youth diminish moral responsibility f...
In a 2002 editorial published in The Economist, the following warning was given: Genetics may yet t...
This chapter is a submission to the Oxford Handbook of Law and the Regulation of Technology edited b...
# The Author(s) 2009. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Could ...