This article addresses the law\u27s concept of the person and its relation to responsibility and the excusing conditions. It demonstrates that causation of behavior in general, even pathological biological causation, is not itself and excuse and suggests that the incapacity for rationality is the genuline basis of moral and legal excuse. The paper concludes by applying its theses to the case of Spyder Cystkopf, a man with a confirmed subarachnoid cyst, who killed his wife during a heated argument with her
Mental causation is a foundational assumption of modern criminal justice. The law takes it for grant...
This article first addresses the persistent confusion between causation and excuse. It demonstrates ...
Arguments for the importance of neuroscience reach across many disciplines. Advocates of neuroscienc...
This article addresses the law\u27s concept of the person and its relation to responsibility and the...
This article addresses new developments in neuroscience, and their implications for law. It explores...
[This download includes the table of contents and chapter 1.] When we praise, b...
Mental causation is a foundational assumption of modern criminal justice. The law takes it for grant...
Will neuroscience revolutionize forensic practice and our legal institutions? In the debate about th...
This brief diagnostic note identifies a cognitive pathology, Brain Overclaim Syndrome [BOS], that ...
Traumatic brain injury (TBI), particularly in severe cases, can have such extraordinary effects on o...
In this chapter, we explore the potential influence that advances in neuroscience may have on legal ...
In the contemporary debate on the use of the neurosciences in ethics and law, numerous arguments hav...
Does a diagnosis of brain dysfunction matter for ascriptions of moral responsibility? This chapter a...
In a 2002 editorial published in The Economist, the following warning was given: Genetics may yet t...
Patterson deny that the activities of persons (knowl-edge, rule-following, interpretation) can be un...
Mental causation is a foundational assumption of modern criminal justice. The law takes it for grant...
This article first addresses the persistent confusion between causation and excuse. It demonstrates ...
Arguments for the importance of neuroscience reach across many disciplines. Advocates of neuroscienc...
This article addresses the law\u27s concept of the person and its relation to responsibility and the...
This article addresses new developments in neuroscience, and their implications for law. It explores...
[This download includes the table of contents and chapter 1.] When we praise, b...
Mental causation is a foundational assumption of modern criminal justice. The law takes it for grant...
Will neuroscience revolutionize forensic practice and our legal institutions? In the debate about th...
This brief diagnostic note identifies a cognitive pathology, Brain Overclaim Syndrome [BOS], that ...
Traumatic brain injury (TBI), particularly in severe cases, can have such extraordinary effects on o...
In this chapter, we explore the potential influence that advances in neuroscience may have on legal ...
In the contemporary debate on the use of the neurosciences in ethics and law, numerous arguments hav...
Does a diagnosis of brain dysfunction matter for ascriptions of moral responsibility? This chapter a...
In a 2002 editorial published in The Economist, the following warning was given: Genetics may yet t...
Patterson deny that the activities of persons (knowl-edge, rule-following, interpretation) can be un...
Mental causation is a foundational assumption of modern criminal justice. The law takes it for grant...
This article first addresses the persistent confusion between causation and excuse. It demonstrates ...
Arguments for the importance of neuroscience reach across many disciplines. Advocates of neuroscienc...