This paper studies comparative risk aversion between risk averse agents in the presence of a background risk. Although the literature covers this question extensively, our contribution differs from most of the literature in two respects. First, background risk does not need to be additive or multiplicative. Second, the two risks are not necessary mean independent, and may be conditional expectation increasing or decreasing. We show that our order of cross Ross risk aversion is equivalent to the order of partial risk premium, while our index of decreasing cross Ross risk aversion is equivalent to decreasing partial risk premium. These results generalize the comparative risk aversion model developed by Ross (1981) for mean independent risks....
This paper studies the impact of background risk on the indifference curve. We first study the shape...
Working paper GATE 2011-19An article about Kihlstrom and Mirman about comparative risk aversion with...
This paper examines how background risk affects risk taking under rank-dependent utility. I assume t...
This paper studies comparative risk aversion between risk averse agents in the presence of a backgro...
This paper studies comparative risk aversion between risk averse agents in the presence of a backgro...
This paper studies comparative risk aversion between risk averse agents in the presence of a backgro...
This note determines a sufficient condition on (von Neumann-Morgenstern) utility functions to preser...
International audienceWe introduce the notion of cross-risk vulnerability to generalize the concept ...
We define decreasing higher-degree Ross risk aversion and provide an intuitive interpretation for it...
In the literature, utility functions in the expected utility class are generically limited to second...
Abstract: In the framework of expected utility, nth-degree risk aversion/loving is unequivocally ch...
We provide comparative global conditions for downside risk aversion, which are similar to the ones s...
We consider the demand for state contingent claims in the presence of a zero-mean, non-hedgeable bac...
At first glance, there would appear to be no relationship between Bell’s (1988) concept of one-switc...
This paper analyzes increased risk aversion in the presence of two risks. Necessary and sufficient c...
This paper studies the impact of background risk on the indifference curve. We first study the shape...
Working paper GATE 2011-19An article about Kihlstrom and Mirman about comparative risk aversion with...
This paper examines how background risk affects risk taking under rank-dependent utility. I assume t...
This paper studies comparative risk aversion between risk averse agents in the presence of a backgro...
This paper studies comparative risk aversion between risk averse agents in the presence of a backgro...
This paper studies comparative risk aversion between risk averse agents in the presence of a backgro...
This note determines a sufficient condition on (von Neumann-Morgenstern) utility functions to preser...
International audienceWe introduce the notion of cross-risk vulnerability to generalize the concept ...
We define decreasing higher-degree Ross risk aversion and provide an intuitive interpretation for it...
In the literature, utility functions in the expected utility class are generically limited to second...
Abstract: In the framework of expected utility, nth-degree risk aversion/loving is unequivocally ch...
We provide comparative global conditions for downside risk aversion, which are similar to the ones s...
We consider the demand for state contingent claims in the presence of a zero-mean, non-hedgeable bac...
At first glance, there would appear to be no relationship between Bell’s (1988) concept of one-switc...
This paper analyzes increased risk aversion in the presence of two risks. Necessary and sufficient c...
This paper studies the impact of background risk on the indifference curve. We first study the shape...
Working paper GATE 2011-19An article about Kihlstrom and Mirman about comparative risk aversion with...
This paper examines how background risk affects risk taking under rank-dependent utility. I assume t...