The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Kelo v. City of New London, has spurred national debate, as many people portray the court’s decision as a damaging blow to private property rights. In Kelo, the court confirmed local government’s ability to condemn property in an area designated as blighted by the state, in order to encourage economic development. This article highlights several positive examples of this sort of condemnation in New York case law, where the public interest was served by economic redevelopment. The article goes further, to distinguish several legal decisions from Kelo, where courts invalidated condemnations upon a finding that the condemnations would serve private interests rather than public interest
The tension between private property rights, human rights, and community are at an all time high in ...
A little more than a year after the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s decision in Kelo v. City of New London u...
People care about property. In 2005, the United States Supreme Court decided two cases with deep co...
The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Kelo v. City of New London, has spurred national debat...
The 2005 Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. City of New London has galvanized much unwarranted contro...
The 2005 Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. City of New London has galvanized much unwarranted contro...
When the Supreme Court announced its 2005 decision in Kelo v. City of New London, few legal schola...
When the Supreme Court announced its 2005 decision in Kelo v. City of New London, few legal schola...
The Court\u27s decision last term in Kelo v. City of New London, 125 S.Ct. 2655 (2005), has drawn he...
which held that the government can force the sale of private property for the purpose of economic de...
which held that the government can force the sale of private property for the purpose of economic de...
The press releases of property rights activists and the media’s rapid embrace of their views have pe...
On June 23, 2005, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in the now infamous case of Kelo...
On June 23, 2005, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in the now infamous case of Kelo...
In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of eminent domain takings that benefit ...
The tension between private property rights, human rights, and community are at an all time high in ...
A little more than a year after the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s decision in Kelo v. City of New London u...
People care about property. In 2005, the United States Supreme Court decided two cases with deep co...
The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Kelo v. City of New London, has spurred national debat...
The 2005 Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. City of New London has galvanized much unwarranted contro...
The 2005 Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. City of New London has galvanized much unwarranted contro...
When the Supreme Court announced its 2005 decision in Kelo v. City of New London, few legal schola...
When the Supreme Court announced its 2005 decision in Kelo v. City of New London, few legal schola...
The Court\u27s decision last term in Kelo v. City of New London, 125 S.Ct. 2655 (2005), has drawn he...
which held that the government can force the sale of private property for the purpose of economic de...
which held that the government can force the sale of private property for the purpose of economic de...
The press releases of property rights activists and the media’s rapid embrace of their views have pe...
On June 23, 2005, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in the now infamous case of Kelo...
On June 23, 2005, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in the now infamous case of Kelo...
In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of eminent domain takings that benefit ...
The tension between private property rights, human rights, and community are at an all time high in ...
A little more than a year after the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s decision in Kelo v. City of New London u...
People care about property. In 2005, the United States Supreme Court decided two cases with deep co...