In Post Danmark II, the Court held that, in the context of Article 102 TFEU, it is not necessary to show that an anticompetitive effect is of a ‘serious’ or ‘appreciable’ nature to apply that provision. In this context, the notion of ‘appreciability’ must be distinguished from that of ‘likelihood’, which refers to the probability of the anticompetitive effects of the practice. The notion must also be distinguished from that of effects as, contrary to what has sometimes been suggested, ruling out the need to show the appreciability of an anticompetitive effect does not say anything about what an effect is
This paper considers which circumstances constitute an infringement of Article 101 of the Treaty on ...
Judicial control of the Commission's complex economic appraisals in EU competition enforcement has l...
Currently, there is a debate in the European Union regarding the European Commission’s approach in a...
In Post Danmark II, the Court held that, in the context of Article 102 TFEU, it is not necessary to ...
A system of standardised, ‘all-unit’ rebates implemented by a dominant firm is contrary to Article 1...
The interpretation of Article 102 TFEU by the EU courts has given rise to considerable controversy i...
As a leading model of law on abuse of dominance, Article 102 TFEU hosts two notoriously vague concep...
This article examines the meaning and scope of the notion of anticompetitive effects in EU competiti...
Judicial control of the Commission’s complex economic appraisals in EU competition enforcement has l...
The interpretation of Article 102 TFEU by the EU courts has given rise to considerable controversy i...
The decentralized enforcement regime of EU competition law is based on the assumption that the obli...
Recent decisions of the EU courts on the object/effect distinction have left a wake of widespread di...
When competition authorities investigate anti-competitive conduct of undertakings, they can be confr...
The article is concerned with subsidiarity in Directive 2014/104 EU on actions for antitrust damages...
Article 102 TFEU prohibits any abuse by one or more undertakings in a dominant position. A dominant ...
This paper considers which circumstances constitute an infringement of Article 101 of the Treaty on ...
Judicial control of the Commission's complex economic appraisals in EU competition enforcement has l...
Currently, there is a debate in the European Union regarding the European Commission’s approach in a...
In Post Danmark II, the Court held that, in the context of Article 102 TFEU, it is not necessary to ...
A system of standardised, ‘all-unit’ rebates implemented by a dominant firm is contrary to Article 1...
The interpretation of Article 102 TFEU by the EU courts has given rise to considerable controversy i...
As a leading model of law on abuse of dominance, Article 102 TFEU hosts two notoriously vague concep...
This article examines the meaning and scope of the notion of anticompetitive effects in EU competiti...
Judicial control of the Commission’s complex economic appraisals in EU competition enforcement has l...
The interpretation of Article 102 TFEU by the EU courts has given rise to considerable controversy i...
The decentralized enforcement regime of EU competition law is based on the assumption that the obli...
Recent decisions of the EU courts on the object/effect distinction have left a wake of widespread di...
When competition authorities investigate anti-competitive conduct of undertakings, they can be confr...
The article is concerned with subsidiarity in Directive 2014/104 EU on actions for antitrust damages...
Article 102 TFEU prohibits any abuse by one or more undertakings in a dominant position. A dominant ...
This paper considers which circumstances constitute an infringement of Article 101 of the Treaty on ...
Judicial control of the Commission's complex economic appraisals in EU competition enforcement has l...
Currently, there is a debate in the European Union regarding the European Commission’s approach in a...