Topics
Rice InstituteAgent
In criminal cases the task of the judge is to transform the uncertainty about the facts into the cer...
Since Sugden v. St. Leonards I there has been a broad tendency in this country to admit any statemen...
A lot has happened in the last decade on rationalising the congeries of rules of evidence applied in...
Consciousness of guilt is another state of mind that raises anew set of legal and psychological prob...
Over the years, the courts have developed numerous devices for controlling the jury in the exercise ...
The question of when and how jurors form opinions about evidence presented at trial has been the foc...
One has only to read the first few chapters of Thayer\u27s Prelimmary Treatise on Evidence to realiz...
The judgment of the Court of Appeal in R v T [1] raises several issues relating to the evaluation of...
The potential effects of stricken evidence on jurors' decisions is a problem for legal proceedings, ...
The common law of evidence is counterintuitive because it seeks to facilitate the search for truth b...
The primary aim of this chapter is to explain the nature of evidential reasoning, the characteristic...
Although the early history of the jurata shows it to have been chosen from among those who were fami...
This thesis examines deliberation in legal proceedings. Legal deliberation is conceived of as the pr...
This book treats the history of the English criminal trial jury from its origins to the eve of the V...
Courts of last resort now seldom reverse a ruling on the competency of witnesses.\u27 Convinced, and...
In criminal cases the task of the judge is to transform the uncertainty about the facts into the cer...
Since Sugden v. St. Leonards I there has been a broad tendency in this country to admit any statemen...
A lot has happened in the last decade on rationalising the congeries of rules of evidence applied in...
Consciousness of guilt is another state of mind that raises anew set of legal and psychological prob...
Over the years, the courts have developed numerous devices for controlling the jury in the exercise ...
The question of when and how jurors form opinions about evidence presented at trial has been the foc...
One has only to read the first few chapters of Thayer\u27s Prelimmary Treatise on Evidence to realiz...
The judgment of the Court of Appeal in R v T [1] raises several issues relating to the evaluation of...
The potential effects of stricken evidence on jurors' decisions is a problem for legal proceedings, ...
The common law of evidence is counterintuitive because it seeks to facilitate the search for truth b...
The primary aim of this chapter is to explain the nature of evidential reasoning, the characteristic...
Although the early history of the jurata shows it to have been chosen from among those who were fami...
This thesis examines deliberation in legal proceedings. Legal deliberation is conceived of as the pr...
This book treats the history of the English criminal trial jury from its origins to the eve of the V...
Courts of last resort now seldom reverse a ruling on the competency of witnesses.\u27 Convinced, and...
In criminal cases the task of the judge is to transform the uncertainty about the facts into the cer...
Since Sugden v. St. Leonards I there has been a broad tendency in this country to admit any statemen...
A lot has happened in the last decade on rationalising the congeries of rules of evidence applied in...
Add to ORKG