Add to ORKGThe primary aim of this chapter is to explain the nature of evidential reasoning, the characteristic difficulties encountered, and the tools to address these difficulties. Our focus is on evidential reasoning in criminal cases. There is an extensive scholarly literature on these topics, and it is a secondary aim of the chapter to provide readers the means to find their way in historical and ongoing debates
Most legal systems require jurors to consider all the evidence presented at trial. Hence when there ...
In legal proceedings, a fact-finder needs to decide whether a defendant is guilty or not based on pr...
In legal proceedings, a fact-finder needs to decide whether a defendant is guilty or not based on pr...
To learn from the past, we analyse 1,088 computer as a target judgements for evidential reasoning ...
As a result of recent scandals concerning evidence and proof in the administration of criminal justi...
As a result of recent scandals concerning evidence and proof in the administration of criminal justi...
As a result of recent scandals concerning evidence and proof in the administration of criminal justi...
There are two competing theoretical frameworks with which cognitive sciences examines how people rea...
There are two competing theoretical frameworks with which cognitive sciences examines how people rea...
The continuous increase in criminal activities in all countries, namely the offences which undermine...
There are two competing theoretical frameworks with which cognitive sciences examines how people rea...
Due to the uses of DNA profiling in criminal investigation and decision-making, it is ever more comm...
Due to the uses of DNA profiling in criminal investigation and decision-making, it is ever more comm...
Eyewitness misidentification is a leading cause of wrongful conviction. Although the prior probabili...
To learn from the past, we analyse 1,088 "computer as a target" judgements for evidential reasoning ...
Most legal systems require jurors to consider all the evidence presented at trial. Hence when there ...
In legal proceedings, a fact-finder needs to decide whether a defendant is guilty or not based on pr...
In legal proceedings, a fact-finder needs to decide whether a defendant is guilty or not based on pr...
To learn from the past, we analyse 1,088 computer as a target judgements for evidential reasoning ...
As a result of recent scandals concerning evidence and proof in the administration of criminal justi...
As a result of recent scandals concerning evidence and proof in the administration of criminal justi...
As a result of recent scandals concerning evidence and proof in the administration of criminal justi...
There are two competing theoretical frameworks with which cognitive sciences examines how people rea...
There are two competing theoretical frameworks with which cognitive sciences examines how people rea...
The continuous increase in criminal activities in all countries, namely the offences which undermine...
There are two competing theoretical frameworks with which cognitive sciences examines how people rea...
Due to the uses of DNA profiling in criminal investigation and decision-making, it is ever more comm...
Due to the uses of DNA profiling in criminal investigation and decision-making, it is ever more comm...
Eyewitness misidentification is a leading cause of wrongful conviction. Although the prior probabili...
To learn from the past, we analyse 1,088 "computer as a target" judgements for evidential reasoning ...
Most legal systems require jurors to consider all the evidence presented at trial. Hence when there ...
In legal proceedings, a fact-finder needs to decide whether a defendant is guilty or not based on pr...
In legal proceedings, a fact-finder needs to decide whether a defendant is guilty or not based on pr...