Add to ORKGWe defend three controversial claims about preference, credence, and choice. First, all agents (not just rational ones) have complete preferences. Second, all agents (again, not just rational ones) have real-valued credences in every proposition in which they are confident to any degree. Third, there is almost always some unique thing we ought to do, want, or believe
The primary aim of this thesis is to examine some of the arguments that have been leveled against th...
This article discusses the possibility of a rationally justified choice between two options neither ...
This paper presents an argument against the widespread view that ‘hard choices’ are hard because of ...
We defend three controversial claims about preference, credence, and choice. First, all agents (not ...
We argue that all comparative expressions in natural language obey a principle that we call Comparab...
According to influential arguments from several branches of philosophy, there exist some gradable na...
This work uses recent developments in cognitive psychology to critically examine the assumption that...
What, normatively speaking, are the grounds of rational choice? This paper defends ‘comparativism’, ...
The incomparability of alternatives is thought to pose a problem for justified choice, particularly ...
According to Ruth Chang, two items may be evaluatively comparable even when neither is better than, ...
How should one understand comparisons in which neither of two alternatives is at least as good as th...
James Griffin (1986, 1997, 2000) and Ruth Chang (1997) have argued that alternatives (and values) ca...
The primary aim of this thesis is to examine some of the arguments that have been leveled against th...
This article discusses the possibility of a rationally justified choice between two options neither ...
This paper presents an argument against the widespread view that ‘hard choices’ are hard because of ...
We defend three controversial claims about preference, credence, and choice. First, all agents (not ...
We argue that all comparative expressions in natural language obey a principle that we call Comparab...
According to influential arguments from several branches of philosophy, there exist some gradable na...
This work uses recent developments in cognitive psychology to critically examine the assumption that...
What, normatively speaking, are the grounds of rational choice? This paper defends ‘comparativism’, ...
The incomparability of alternatives is thought to pose a problem for justified choice, particularly ...
According to Ruth Chang, two items may be evaluatively comparable even when neither is better than, ...
How should one understand comparisons in which neither of two alternatives is at least as good as th...
James Griffin (1986, 1997, 2000) and Ruth Chang (1997) have argued that alternatives (and values) ca...
The primary aim of this thesis is to examine some of the arguments that have been leveled against th...
This article discusses the possibility of a rationally justified choice between two options neither ...
This paper presents an argument against the widespread view that ‘hard choices’ are hard because of ...