We propose a probabilistic-logical framework for group decision-making. Its main characteristic is that we derive group preferences from agents’ beliefs and utilities rather than from their individual preferences as done in social choice approaches. This can be more appropriate when the individual preferences hide too much of the individuals’ opinions that determined their preferences. We introduce three preference relations and investigate the relationships between the group preferences and in-dividual and subgroup preferences
How can several individuals’ probability assignments to some events be aggregated into a collective ...
Coherent imprecise probabilistic beliefs are modelled as incomplete comparative likelihood relations...
Bayesian belief aggregation is the process of forming a consensus model from the probabilistic belie...
We propose a probabilistic-logical framework for group decision-making. Its main characteristic is ...
If each member of a group assigns a certain probability to a hypothesis, what probability should the...
If a group is modelled as a single Bayesian agent, what should its beliefs be? I propose an axiomati...
There are many reasons we might want to take the opinions of various individuals and pool them to gi...
We introduce a number of logics to reason about collective propositional attitudes that ar...
How can several individuals’ probability assignments to some events be aggregated into a collective ...
How can the propositional attitudes of several individuals be aggregated into overall collective pro...
In this paper we explore the relation between three areas: judgment aggregation, belief merging and ...
In this paper we explore the relation between three areas: judgment aggregation, belief merging and ...
How can several individuals’ probability assignments to some events be aggregated into a collective ...
Coherent imprecise probabilistic beliefs are modelled as incomplete comparative likelihood relations...
Bayesian belief aggregation is the process of forming a consensus model from the probabilistic belie...
We propose a probabilistic-logical framework for group decision-making. Its main characteristic is ...
If each member of a group assigns a certain probability to a hypothesis, what probability should the...
If a group is modelled as a single Bayesian agent, what should its beliefs be? I propose an axiomati...
There are many reasons we might want to take the opinions of various individuals and pool them to gi...
We introduce a number of logics to reason about collective propositional attitudes that ar...
How can several individuals’ probability assignments to some events be aggregated into a collective ...
How can the propositional attitudes of several individuals be aggregated into overall collective pro...
In this paper we explore the relation between three areas: judgment aggregation, belief merging and ...
In this paper we explore the relation between three areas: judgment aggregation, belief merging and ...
How can several individuals’ probability assignments to some events be aggregated into a collective ...
Coherent imprecise probabilistic beliefs are modelled as incomplete comparative likelihood relations...
Bayesian belief aggregation is the process of forming a consensus model from the probabilistic belie...