Add to ORKGAssisting advocates to present their thoughts on the use of restraints as it relates to 14-197 C.M.R. Chapter 5, Regulations Governing Behavioral Support, Modification and Management for People with Intellectual Disabilities or Autism in Maine
Contrary to the expectations articulated in public policy, restrictive interventions are commonly us...
Evidence from research around the world have indicated that the use of restraints and seclusion has ...
This study examines the conflict between guardianship and the American disability rights movement, s...
This project was done in partnership with the NH-ME LEND Leadership Project and Disability Rights Ma...
Historically individuals with disabilities were sent to live in institutions, such as Pineland Cente...
The Coalition and the Maine Developmental Disabilities Council sought to revise and update its diagr...
Data has shown that within Maine and on a national scale, children who have disabilities or special ...
This promising practice describes Vermont’s statewide self-advocacy organization, Green Mountain Sel...
In 2006, a new Maine law mandated the creation of a waiver program that promotes the expansion of su...
We’re pretty good about caring for our disabled citizens—as long as they’re children. It’s time to p...
This poster describes my work assisting the Maine Coalition for Housing and Quality Supports conduct...
The Coalition Against Restraint and Seclusion (C.A.R.S.) is a group of stakeholders whose mission is...
Students with disabilities who receive special education services are entitled under federal law, th...
In the State of Indiana, for students over the age of 14 who have been diagnosed with intellectual o...
As a part of the grant activities of the Real Choice Systems Change grant from the Centers for Medic...
Contrary to the expectations articulated in public policy, restrictive interventions are commonly us...
Evidence from research around the world have indicated that the use of restraints and seclusion has ...
This study examines the conflict between guardianship and the American disability rights movement, s...
This project was done in partnership with the NH-ME LEND Leadership Project and Disability Rights Ma...
Historically individuals with disabilities were sent to live in institutions, such as Pineland Cente...
The Coalition and the Maine Developmental Disabilities Council sought to revise and update its diagr...
Data has shown that within Maine and on a national scale, children who have disabilities or special ...
This promising practice describes Vermont’s statewide self-advocacy organization, Green Mountain Sel...
In 2006, a new Maine law mandated the creation of a waiver program that promotes the expansion of su...
We’re pretty good about caring for our disabled citizens—as long as they’re children. It’s time to p...
This poster describes my work assisting the Maine Coalition for Housing and Quality Supports conduct...
The Coalition Against Restraint and Seclusion (C.A.R.S.) is a group of stakeholders whose mission is...
Students with disabilities who receive special education services are entitled under federal law, th...
In the State of Indiana, for students over the age of 14 who have been diagnosed with intellectual o...
As a part of the grant activities of the Real Choice Systems Change grant from the Centers for Medic...
Contrary to the expectations articulated in public policy, restrictive interventions are commonly us...
Evidence from research around the world have indicated that the use of restraints and seclusion has ...
This study examines the conflict between guardianship and the American disability rights movement, s...