In 2009 Larry Alexander and Kimberly Ferzan published Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal Law. The book set out a theory that those who deserve punishment should receive punishment commensurate with, but no greater than, that which they deserve. Reflections on Crime and Culpability: Problems and Puzzles expands on their innovative ideas on the application of punishment in criminal law. Theorists working in criminal law theory presuppose or ignore puzzles that lurk beneath the surface. Now those who wish to examine these topics will have one monograph that combines the disparate puzzles in criminal law through a unified approach to culpability. Along with some suggestions as to how they might resolve the puzzles, Alexander and Ferzan...
Criminal law scholarship is marked by a sharp fault line separating substantive criminal law from cr...
In this book chapter we give a definition of inchoate crimes and argue that inchoate crimes, so defi...
Critics sometimes maintain that hate crime law punishes an offender for her motive and character and...
In 2009 Larry Alexander and Kimberly Ferzan published Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal La...
In 2009 Larry Alexander and Kimberly Ferzan published Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal La...
This book presents a comprehensive overview of what the criminal law would look like if organized ar...
Criminal law has developed to prohibit new forms of intrusion on the autonomy and mental processes o...
Philosophers of criminal punishment disagree about whether infliction of punishment for negligence c...
This is a review of Larry Alexander and Kim Ferzan’s Reflections on Crime and Culpability, a sequel ...
Criminal law, for much of the nineteenth century and part of the twentieth, was at the forefront of ...
These are good times – at least for the theory of criminal law. This special issue of Buffalo Crimin...
The book The Structure and Limits of Criminal Law (Ashgate) collects and reprints classic articles o...
This book reports empirical studies on 18 different areas of substantive criminal law in which the s...
The Model Penal Code identifies five levels of culpable states of mind significant to criminal liabi...
There is in the criminal law perhaps no principle more canonical than the fault principle, which hol...
Criminal law scholarship is marked by a sharp fault line separating substantive criminal law from cr...
In this book chapter we give a definition of inchoate crimes and argue that inchoate crimes, so defi...
Critics sometimes maintain that hate crime law punishes an offender for her motive and character and...
In 2009 Larry Alexander and Kimberly Ferzan published Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal La...
In 2009 Larry Alexander and Kimberly Ferzan published Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal La...
This book presents a comprehensive overview of what the criminal law would look like if organized ar...
Criminal law has developed to prohibit new forms of intrusion on the autonomy and mental processes o...
Philosophers of criminal punishment disagree about whether infliction of punishment for negligence c...
This is a review of Larry Alexander and Kim Ferzan’s Reflections on Crime and Culpability, a sequel ...
Criminal law, for much of the nineteenth century and part of the twentieth, was at the forefront of ...
These are good times – at least for the theory of criminal law. This special issue of Buffalo Crimin...
The book The Structure and Limits of Criminal Law (Ashgate) collects and reprints classic articles o...
This book reports empirical studies on 18 different areas of substantive criminal law in which the s...
The Model Penal Code identifies five levels of culpable states of mind significant to criminal liabi...
There is in the criminal law perhaps no principle more canonical than the fault principle, which hol...
Criminal law scholarship is marked by a sharp fault line separating substantive criminal law from cr...
In this book chapter we give a definition of inchoate crimes and argue that inchoate crimes, so defi...
Critics sometimes maintain that hate crime law punishes an offender for her motive and character and...