One of the first megajournals, PLOS ONE, has played a significant role in changing scholarly communication and in particular peer review, by placing an emphasis on soundness, as opposed to novelty, in published research. Drawing on a study of peer review reports from PLOS ONE recently published as an open-access book, Martin Paul Eve, Daniel Paul O’Donnell, Cameron Neylon, Sam Moore, Robert Gadie, Victoria Odeniyi, and Shahina Parvin¸ assess PLOS ONE’s impact on the culture of peer review and what it can tell us about efforts to change academic culture more broadly
Outlining their recent research into the different interests and commitments of groups looking to re...
In The Crowdsourced Panopticon: Conformity and Control on Social Media, Jeremy Weissman explores the...
This is the white paper submitted to the National Endowment for the Humanities“MuSO: Aggregation and...
The peer review process has been subjected to a steady stream of criticism in recent years. This has...
Today marks the beginning of Peer Review Week 2017. Here on the Impact Blog, we’ll be featuring post...
Open peer review is moving into the mainstream, but it is often poorly understood and surveys of res...
The shortcomings of the peer review process are well-documented, with it being variously described a...
Professor Fleur Johns offers 10 rules of thumb that have guided her own reviewing efforts and may pr...
All agree that peer review is an area of scholarly communications that is ripe for innovation. Howev...
The literature review is a staple of the scholarly article. It allows authors to summarise previous ...
As the rate and volume of academic publications has risen, so too has the pressure on journal editor...
In The Crowdsourced Panopticon: Conformity and Control on Social Media, Jeremy Weissman explores the...
About research on machines, research with machines, and research as a machine. Publication resulting...
During this Peer Review Week 2018, Tom Culley shares findings from the new Publons "Global State of ...
Almost 1,500 papers have been uploaded to SocArXiv since its launch last year. Up to now the platfor...
Outlining their recent research into the different interests and commitments of groups looking to re...
In The Crowdsourced Panopticon: Conformity and Control on Social Media, Jeremy Weissman explores the...
This is the white paper submitted to the National Endowment for the Humanities“MuSO: Aggregation and...
The peer review process has been subjected to a steady stream of criticism in recent years. This has...
Today marks the beginning of Peer Review Week 2017. Here on the Impact Blog, we’ll be featuring post...
Open peer review is moving into the mainstream, but it is often poorly understood and surveys of res...
The shortcomings of the peer review process are well-documented, with it being variously described a...
Professor Fleur Johns offers 10 rules of thumb that have guided her own reviewing efforts and may pr...
All agree that peer review is an area of scholarly communications that is ripe for innovation. Howev...
The literature review is a staple of the scholarly article. It allows authors to summarise previous ...
As the rate and volume of academic publications has risen, so too has the pressure on journal editor...
In The Crowdsourced Panopticon: Conformity and Control on Social Media, Jeremy Weissman explores the...
About research on machines, research with machines, and research as a machine. Publication resulting...
During this Peer Review Week 2018, Tom Culley shares findings from the new Publons "Global State of ...
Almost 1,500 papers have been uploaded to SocArXiv since its launch last year. Up to now the platfor...
Outlining their recent research into the different interests and commitments of groups looking to re...
In The Crowdsourced Panopticon: Conformity and Control on Social Media, Jeremy Weissman explores the...
This is the white paper submitted to the National Endowment for the Humanities“MuSO: Aggregation and...