Add to ORKGOpen peer review is moving into the mainstream, but it is often poorly understood and surveys of researcher attitudes show important barriers to implementation. Tony Ross-Hellauer provides an overview of work conducted as part of an OpenAIRE2020 project to offer clarity on OPR, and issues an open call to publishers and researchers interested in OPR to come together to share data and scientifically explore the efficacy of OPR systems as part of an Open Peer Review Assessment Framework
The current review system for many academic articles is flawed, hindering the publication of excelle...
Open science is about increasing the reuse of research, and making sure that publicly funded researc...
Open Access initiatives promise to extend access to scholarly conversations. However, the dominant m...
The peer review process has been subjected to a steady stream of criticism in recent years. This has...
One of the first megajournals, PLOS ONE, has played a significant role in changing scholarly communi...
Today marks the beginning of Peer Review Week 2017. Here on the Impact Blog, we’ll be featuring post...
The shortcomings of the peer review process are well-documented, with it being variously described a...
Ethical issues related to the peer review process are increasingly complex and can be tricky to navi...
Almost 1,500 papers have been uploaded to SocArXiv since its launch last year. Up to now the platfor...
As the rate and volume of academic publications has risen, so too has the pressure on journal editor...
All agree that peer review is an area of scholarly communications that is ripe for innovation. Howev...
As flaws in the peer review process are highlighted and calls for reform become more frequent, it ma...
During this Peer Review Week 2018, Tom Culley shares findings from the new Publons "Global State of ...
Today, academics must prepare written proposals describing the research they wish to conduct and sub...
The aim of peer review for research grants and academic hiring boards is to provide expert independe...
The current review system for many academic articles is flawed, hindering the publication of excelle...
Open science is about increasing the reuse of research, and making sure that publicly funded researc...
Open Access initiatives promise to extend access to scholarly conversations. However, the dominant m...
The peer review process has been subjected to a steady stream of criticism in recent years. This has...
One of the first megajournals, PLOS ONE, has played a significant role in changing scholarly communi...
Today marks the beginning of Peer Review Week 2017. Here on the Impact Blog, we’ll be featuring post...
The shortcomings of the peer review process are well-documented, with it being variously described a...
Ethical issues related to the peer review process are increasingly complex and can be tricky to navi...
Almost 1,500 papers have been uploaded to SocArXiv since its launch last year. Up to now the platfor...
As the rate and volume of academic publications has risen, so too has the pressure on journal editor...
All agree that peer review is an area of scholarly communications that is ripe for innovation. Howev...
As flaws in the peer review process are highlighted and calls for reform become more frequent, it ma...
During this Peer Review Week 2018, Tom Culley shares findings from the new Publons "Global State of ...
Today, academics must prepare written proposals describing the research they wish to conduct and sub...
The aim of peer review for research grants and academic hiring boards is to provide expert independe...
The current review system for many academic articles is flawed, hindering the publication of excelle...
Open science is about increasing the reuse of research, and making sure that publicly funded researc...
Open Access initiatives promise to extend access to scholarly conversations. However, the dominant m...