Firstly, I present some of my most important answers to Miščević’s objections to my 2014 paper which I fully disagree with. Secondly and more importantly, I point out that there is a possible confusion or misunderstanding about the distinction between the object-level (sentence produced) and meta-level (sentence judged). I argue that competentionalist actually conflates object and meta levels and show the fi nal consequences of such a confl ation. The ordinarist fi rmly believes that there should be a separation between the object-level and meta-level and provides the explanation for this. Finally, I briefl y comment on the so-called ‘Route Question’, the path from the underlying competence to the central processor and argue that competenti...