While the judicial merit system in Alaska has effectively balanced accountability with the competing need for independence in the judiciary, the growing trend of politicized retention elections threatens that independence. This Note examines the threat to the Alaskan judicial merit system, argues for the importance of protecting an independent judiciary, and proposes a number of potential solutions to reform or replace the current retention election system
It is hardly novel to suggest that judicial elections, including retention elections, illustrate pro...
The voter recall of California judge Aaron Persky in June 2018 was a watershed cultural moment. For ...
States vary widely in their judicial selection systems, with some seeking more judicial accountabili...
The judicial selection and retention provisions of the Alaska Constitution, found in Article IV, ach...
The results of recent judicial retention elections in Alaska, and the recent increase in political a...
Delegates to Alaska\u27s Constitutional Convention adopted a Judiciary Article that called for the s...
The Alaska legislature is considering a bill — Senate Joint Resolution 3 — that would put before vot...
From the chapter introduction: "How does the Alaska political and governmental process deal with the...
The ousting of three Iowa Supreme Court Justices has sent shockwaves throughout the country for all ...
In the November 2000 election, the citizens of Florida had the opportunity to switch from the nonpar...
This article discusses the problems and potential solutions with the system of judicial appointment ...
The different processes by which state judges are selected is an increasingly popular topic for disc...
Jordan M. Singer reflects on the uncertain future of judicial retention elections, in response to To...
In this article, Martin Belsky makes the case for judicial selection based on merit, as opposed to p...
The judicial-merit selection and retention system for appointing judges to the bench was designed to...
It is hardly novel to suggest that judicial elections, including retention elections, illustrate pro...
The voter recall of California judge Aaron Persky in June 2018 was a watershed cultural moment. For ...
States vary widely in their judicial selection systems, with some seeking more judicial accountabili...
The judicial selection and retention provisions of the Alaska Constitution, found in Article IV, ach...
The results of recent judicial retention elections in Alaska, and the recent increase in political a...
Delegates to Alaska\u27s Constitutional Convention adopted a Judiciary Article that called for the s...
The Alaska legislature is considering a bill — Senate Joint Resolution 3 — that would put before vot...
From the chapter introduction: "How does the Alaska political and governmental process deal with the...
The ousting of three Iowa Supreme Court Justices has sent shockwaves throughout the country for all ...
In the November 2000 election, the citizens of Florida had the opportunity to switch from the nonpar...
This article discusses the problems and potential solutions with the system of judicial appointment ...
The different processes by which state judges are selected is an increasingly popular topic for disc...
Jordan M. Singer reflects on the uncertain future of judicial retention elections, in response to To...
In this article, Martin Belsky makes the case for judicial selection based on merit, as opposed to p...
The judicial-merit selection and retention system for appointing judges to the bench was designed to...
It is hardly novel to suggest that judicial elections, including retention elections, illustrate pro...
The voter recall of California judge Aaron Persky in June 2018 was a watershed cultural moment. For ...
States vary widely in their judicial selection systems, with some seeking more judicial accountabili...