This article discusses the problems and potential solutions with the system of judicial appointment in the state of Nebraska. The article focuses on how improving public awareness about the existing system, its goals, and its current weaknesses, and implementing steps to address those weaknesses, will help to keep everyone moving toward the best possible system. While changing attitudes and interest in judicial retention elections is certainly not an easy task, it is only through seeking such change that reformers of an elective retention system can hope to near its potential effectiveness
The purpose of this Comment is to examine further a proposal for complete court reform in Nebraska p...
Today, myriad approaches for selecting judges exist and few states—if any at all—use identical schem...
Those who are concerned about judicial independence and accountability in the United States quite ri...
In August 1979, Time magazine featured an article titled, “Judging the Judges.” In that article, nea...
This article is written in the hope that it will be helpful to members of the Nebraska Bar in famili...
Judges vs. Juries by Brian H. Bornstein Thoughts About Enriching Judicial Independence by Improvin...
The Article focuses on one of the pillars of the judicial appointive process, the judicial nominatin...
This article discusses judicial appointment and judicial independence in Colorado. The article argu...
This issue of Court Review contains the AJA White Paper The Debate over the Selection and Retention ...
The subject of the selection of state court judges has many aspects, including the choice of the sel...
This Article reviews some of the factors that have diminished the appeal of merit selection for judg...
Our lead article is a thorough review of the 2010 Iowa judicial-retention elections by Professor Roy...
This article argues that popularly electing judges is incompatible with the three basic elements of ...
In the November 2000 election, the citizens of Florida had the opportunity to switch from the nonpar...
During the twentieth century, judicial reformers attempting to depoliticize the selection of state c...
The purpose of this Comment is to examine further a proposal for complete court reform in Nebraska p...
Today, myriad approaches for selecting judges exist and few states—if any at all—use identical schem...
Those who are concerned about judicial independence and accountability in the United States quite ri...
In August 1979, Time magazine featured an article titled, “Judging the Judges.” In that article, nea...
This article is written in the hope that it will be helpful to members of the Nebraska Bar in famili...
Judges vs. Juries by Brian H. Bornstein Thoughts About Enriching Judicial Independence by Improvin...
The Article focuses on one of the pillars of the judicial appointive process, the judicial nominatin...
This article discusses judicial appointment and judicial independence in Colorado. The article argu...
This issue of Court Review contains the AJA White Paper The Debate over the Selection and Retention ...
The subject of the selection of state court judges has many aspects, including the choice of the sel...
This Article reviews some of the factors that have diminished the appeal of merit selection for judg...
Our lead article is a thorough review of the 2010 Iowa judicial-retention elections by Professor Roy...
This article argues that popularly electing judges is incompatible with the three basic elements of ...
In the November 2000 election, the citizens of Florida had the opportunity to switch from the nonpar...
During the twentieth century, judicial reformers attempting to depoliticize the selection of state c...
The purpose of this Comment is to examine further a proposal for complete court reform in Nebraska p...
Today, myriad approaches for selecting judges exist and few states—if any at all—use identical schem...
Those who are concerned about judicial independence and accountability in the United States quite ri...