Gustav Radbruch

As recently as the end of the last World War the name and work of Gustav Radbruch were virtually unknown in the Anglo-American legal world. In 1938 Roscoe Pound, in his encyclopedic survey, Fifty Years of Jurisprudence, had given a concise account of Radbruch\u27s legal philosophy in the context of his section on neo-idealism. In 1944 Anton Hermann Chroust wrote a penetrating analysis of Radbruch\u27s philosophy of law, and about the same time the first edition of the present writer\u27s Legal Theory, published on the other side of the Atlantic, included Gustav Radbruch in the survey of major legal philosophers. It also acknowledged the author\u27s deep indebtedness to Radbruch\u27s principal work. Since Radbruch died in 1949 at the age of seventy-one, there has been a dramatic and welcome change. Not only has he remained the dominating figure in post-war Continental and especially German legal philosophy; in both Britain and the United States his work and views have been discussed by leading jurists such as Professors Campbell and Hart in Britain, and Professors Fuller and Patterson in this country. Radbruch\u27s Rechtsphilosophie was at last made accessible (in 1950) to English readers through the translation of his principal work in the Twentieth Century Series of Legal Philosophers