Several anti-debunkers have argued that evolutionary explanations of our moral beliefs fail to meet a necessary condition on undermining defeat called modal security. They conclude that evolution, therefore, does not debunk our moral beliefs. This article shows that modal security is false if knowledge is virtuous achievement. New information can undermine a given belief without providing reason to doubt that that belief is sensitive or safe. This leads to a novel conception of undermining defeat, and it shows that successful debunking of moral realism is possible
Evolutionary debunking arguments (EDAs) purport to show that robust moral realism, the metaethical v...
Denying the conclusion of a valid argument is not generally permissible if one suspends on one premi...
Evolutionary debunking arguments claim that evolution has influenced our moral faculties in such a w...
Several anti-debunkers have argued that evolutionary explanations of our moral beliefs fail to meet ...
Several anti-debunkers have argued that evolutionary explanations of our moral beliefs fail to meet ...
This paper reconstructs what I take to be the central evolutionary debunking argument that underlies...
According to principles of modal security, evidence undermines a belief only when it calls into ques...
This thesis aims to clarify and strengthen an epistemological challenge to moral realism. I argue th...
I discuss the structure of genealogical debunking arguments. I argue that they undermine our ...
I argue that evolutionary debunking arguments are dialectically ineffective against a range of plaus...
<p>Heightened awareness of the evolutionary, socio-cultural, and psychological origins of our moral ...
Fifteen years ago, Sharon Street and Richard Joyce advanced evolutionary debunking arguments against...
In “The Evolutionary Debunking of Quasi-Realism,” Neil Sinclair and James Chamberlain present a nove...
Evolutionary debunking arguments (EDAs) purport to show that robust moral realism, the metaethical v...
Denying the conclusion of a valid argument is not generally permissible if one suspends on one premi...
Evolutionary debunking arguments claim that evolution has influenced our moral faculties in such a w...
Several anti-debunkers have argued that evolutionary explanations of our moral beliefs fail to meet ...
Several anti-debunkers have argued that evolutionary explanations of our moral beliefs fail to meet ...
This paper reconstructs what I take to be the central evolutionary debunking argument that underlies...
According to principles of modal security, evidence undermines a belief only when it calls into ques...
This thesis aims to clarify and strengthen an epistemological challenge to moral realism. I argue th...
I discuss the structure of genealogical debunking arguments. I argue that they undermine our ...
I argue that evolutionary debunking arguments are dialectically ineffective against a range of plaus...
<p>Heightened awareness of the evolutionary, socio-cultural, and psychological origins of our moral ...
Fifteen years ago, Sharon Street and Richard Joyce advanced evolutionary debunking arguments against...
In “The Evolutionary Debunking of Quasi-Realism,” Neil Sinclair and James Chamberlain present a nove...
Evolutionary debunking arguments (EDAs) purport to show that robust moral realism, the metaethical v...
Denying the conclusion of a valid argument is not generally permissible if one suspends on one premi...
Evolutionary debunking arguments claim that evolution has influenced our moral faculties in such a w...