Judicial Disqualification: An Analysis of Federal Law (second edition) outlines the statutory framework of federal judicial disqualification law under the statutes, 28 U.S.C. §§ 455, 144, 47, and 2106. The monograph substantially revises and expands on the first edition, and analyzes the case law, with a focus both on substantive disqualification standards and procedural requirements. It features a revised organizational structure and includes new material, as well as updated cases.https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facbooks/1223/thumbnail.jp
Recusal, or judicial disqualification, occurs when a judge abstains from a particular legal proceedi...
Quarterly journal containing articles, notes, and other analyses of litigation and related issues in...
In recent years, high profile disqualification disputes have caught the attention of the public. In ...
Judicial Disqualification: An Analysis of Federal Law outlines the statutory framework of federal ju...
I. Introduction II. Specific Statutory Grounds for Disqualification ... A. Personal Bias or Prejudic...
Federal and state law regarding disqualification (aka recusal) of judges is both similar and differe...
One essential component of equal justice under the law is a neutral and detached judge to preside ov...
Litigants in federal district courts more often are asking judges to disqualify themselves from case...
The common law “reasonable apprehension of bias” test for judicial disqualification is highly fact- ...
Disqualification of a judge occurs when he is ineligible by law to sit in a particular case. At the ...
One of the basic tenets of our judicial system is the right of litigants to have a neutral and impar...
Although federal judges do not run for election, over the last three decades the process of nominati...
The United States Supreme Court has recognized circumstances in which the probability of judicial bi...
An original action in quo warranto was brought in the name of the state on the relation of the Attor...
Ethical issues involving federal judges have been much in the news recently. Among other development...
Recusal, or judicial disqualification, occurs when a judge abstains from a particular legal proceedi...
Quarterly journal containing articles, notes, and other analyses of litigation and related issues in...
In recent years, high profile disqualification disputes have caught the attention of the public. In ...
Judicial Disqualification: An Analysis of Federal Law outlines the statutory framework of federal ju...
I. Introduction II. Specific Statutory Grounds for Disqualification ... A. Personal Bias or Prejudic...
Federal and state law regarding disqualification (aka recusal) of judges is both similar and differe...
One essential component of equal justice under the law is a neutral and detached judge to preside ov...
Litigants in federal district courts more often are asking judges to disqualify themselves from case...
The common law “reasonable apprehension of bias” test for judicial disqualification is highly fact- ...
Disqualification of a judge occurs when he is ineligible by law to sit in a particular case. At the ...
One of the basic tenets of our judicial system is the right of litigants to have a neutral and impar...
Although federal judges do not run for election, over the last three decades the process of nominati...
The United States Supreme Court has recognized circumstances in which the probability of judicial bi...
An original action in quo warranto was brought in the name of the state on the relation of the Attor...
Ethical issues involving federal judges have been much in the news recently. Among other development...
Recusal, or judicial disqualification, occurs when a judge abstains from a particular legal proceedi...
Quarterly journal containing articles, notes, and other analyses of litigation and related issues in...
In recent years, high profile disqualification disputes have caught the attention of the public. In ...