The United States Supreme Court has recognized circumstances in which the probability of judicial bias requiring disqualification or recusal is “too high to be constitutionally tolerable.” At the same time, the Texas Constitution contains a number of provisions barring a judge from presiding over a case under specific circumstances, while statutes and procedural rules either disqualify a judge or require him or her to be recused. Thus, whether a particular judge may preside over a given criminal case may be questioned under the Due Process Clause, the Texas Constitution, statue, or the rules of procedure. This Article will examine the applicable constitutional, statutory, and procedural rules that determine whether a particular judge may pr...
In this article, I argue that the recusal procedure used in state and federal courts for nearly all ...
The United States Supreme Court has held that neither the due process clause nor 18 U.S.C. § 3481, w...
One of the basic tenets of our judicial system is the right of litigants to have a neutral and impar...
In affirming convictions pursuant to a Texas statute implementing common law recidivist procedure, t...
Recusal, or judicial disqualification, occurs when a judge abstains from a particular legal proceedi...
In recent years, high profile disqualification disputes have caught the attention of the public. In ...
The common law “reasonable apprehension of bias” test for judicial disqualification is highly fact- ...
Economic necessity, expanding dockets, and judicial bias and unfairness are reasons for removing sum...
Bill introduced by the Texas Senate relating to certain appeals from judgments of municipal courts o...
In the United States, judges are required to recuse themselves - that is, remove themselves from par...
One essential component of equal justice under the law is a neutral and detached judge to preside ov...
Judicial Disqualification: An Analysis of Federal Law (second edition) outlines the statutory framew...
Bill introduced by the Texas House of Representatives relating to the recusal and disqualification o...
This Article examines the Texas Constitution’s grant of authority to appellate courts to review ques...
The purposes of this paper are to evaluate the standard and scope of appellate evidentiary review of...
In this article, I argue that the recusal procedure used in state and federal courts for nearly all ...
The United States Supreme Court has held that neither the due process clause nor 18 U.S.C. § 3481, w...
One of the basic tenets of our judicial system is the right of litigants to have a neutral and impar...
In affirming convictions pursuant to a Texas statute implementing common law recidivist procedure, t...
Recusal, or judicial disqualification, occurs when a judge abstains from a particular legal proceedi...
In recent years, high profile disqualification disputes have caught the attention of the public. In ...
The common law “reasonable apprehension of bias” test for judicial disqualification is highly fact- ...
Economic necessity, expanding dockets, and judicial bias and unfairness are reasons for removing sum...
Bill introduced by the Texas Senate relating to certain appeals from judgments of municipal courts o...
In the United States, judges are required to recuse themselves - that is, remove themselves from par...
One essential component of equal justice under the law is a neutral and detached judge to preside ov...
Judicial Disqualification: An Analysis of Federal Law (second edition) outlines the statutory framew...
Bill introduced by the Texas House of Representatives relating to the recusal and disqualification o...
This Article examines the Texas Constitution’s grant of authority to appellate courts to review ques...
The purposes of this paper are to evaluate the standard and scope of appellate evidentiary review of...
In this article, I argue that the recusal procedure used in state and federal courts for nearly all ...
The United States Supreme Court has held that neither the due process clause nor 18 U.S.C. § 3481, w...
One of the basic tenets of our judicial system is the right of litigants to have a neutral and impar...