This paper is concerned with rhetorical argumentation that aims to alter the beliefs of the listener, and so to influence his future actions, as opposed to classical argumentation that is concerned with the generation of arguments, usually as logical proofs, for and against a given course of action. Rhetorical argumentation includes rhetoric moves such as Threat, Reward and Appeal. Rhetorical argumentative utterances generated by an agent contribute to the strength of its relationship with the listener. This paper examines advice and the rhetoric particle “I advise you …” that may be used to strengthen such relationships.Peer Reviewe
The aim of this paper is to show that classical rhetoric can provide valuable insights in the contem...
It is well known that argumentation can usefully be analysed as a distinct, if complex, type of spee...
This paper attempts to integrate an agnotological taxonomy of “not-knowing” with argumentation theor...
This paper is concerned with rhetorical argumentation that aims to alter the beliefs of the listener...
The theory of argumentation is based on the assumption thatarguments pervade and partly regulate all...
Since modern usage of the core terms is essential in the appropriate interpretation of ancient rheto...
Advice seeking and advice giving have been studied both as speech acts and as complex discursive act...
There has been a growing awareness as to the need of knowledge to improvc public speaking and interp...
Starting from Sperber and Mercier’s theory (2011) on the relationship between reasoning and arguing,...
International audienceContesting the opposition between (scientific) ‘demonstration’ and (rhetorical...
Conflict situations do not only arise from misunderstandings, erroneous perceptions, partial knowled...
Part I: Maneuvering strategically for strategic maneuvering: All theories of argumentation, and part...
Historically, dialectics is the general method of (early) philosophy. The philosophy rhetoric contro...
ABSTRACT: I make a distinction between a traditional conception of Rhetoric as a corpus of practical...
People always talk, discuss, argue, criticize or contradict each other. Have you ever thought of how...
The aim of this paper is to show that classical rhetoric can provide valuable insights in the contem...
It is well known that argumentation can usefully be analysed as a distinct, if complex, type of spee...
This paper attempts to integrate an agnotological taxonomy of “not-knowing” with argumentation theor...
This paper is concerned with rhetorical argumentation that aims to alter the beliefs of the listener...
The theory of argumentation is based on the assumption thatarguments pervade and partly regulate all...
Since modern usage of the core terms is essential in the appropriate interpretation of ancient rheto...
Advice seeking and advice giving have been studied both as speech acts and as complex discursive act...
There has been a growing awareness as to the need of knowledge to improvc public speaking and interp...
Starting from Sperber and Mercier’s theory (2011) on the relationship between reasoning and arguing,...
International audienceContesting the opposition between (scientific) ‘demonstration’ and (rhetorical...
Conflict situations do not only arise from misunderstandings, erroneous perceptions, partial knowled...
Part I: Maneuvering strategically for strategic maneuvering: All theories of argumentation, and part...
Historically, dialectics is the general method of (early) philosophy. The philosophy rhetoric contro...
ABSTRACT: I make a distinction between a traditional conception of Rhetoric as a corpus of practical...
People always talk, discuss, argue, criticize or contradict each other. Have you ever thought of how...
The aim of this paper is to show that classical rhetoric can provide valuable insights in the contem...
It is well known that argumentation can usefully be analysed as a distinct, if complex, type of spee...
This paper attempts to integrate an agnotological taxonomy of “not-knowing” with argumentation theor...