ABSTRACT: I make a distinction between a traditional conception of Rhetoric as a corpus of practical knowledge to improve persuasive abilities, and a more contemporary conception of Rhetoric as a hermeneutic discipline for dealing with communicative activities as a means of influence. I argue that the key difference between both conceptions is whether or not they deal with the rhetorical properties of discourses as a matter of speakers ’ intentions
On relationship between logic and rhetoric and on logical rules vs. rhetorical moves of debate. The ...
There are two interpretations of rhetoric that are backed by a long tradition: as the theory of argu...
In Argumentation Theory after the New Rhetoric, Frans H. van Eemeren characterizes the New Rhetoric ...
I make a distinction between a traditional conception of Rhetoric as a corpus of practical knowledge...
Since antiquity, the notion of rhetoric has been associated with Aristotle, Cicero and Quintilian. T...
A proper assessment of the relation between discourse structure and speaker's communicative int...
Since Aristotle, the study of rhetoric has focused on the persuasive aspect of discourse in the poli...
Theories of speech communication found their earliest expression in the writings of the ancient Gree...
Aristotle’s Rhetoric is a technical handbook for how to persuade a public audience about what is goo...
This book offers a new approach to the principles and functioning of rhetoric. In everyday life, we ...
In order to vindicate everyday, communicative discourse, in the face of incoherent, implausible st...
Rhetorical argumentation and linguistic argumentation Oswald Ducrot Among the numerous senses associ...
The following paper deals with the relationship between elocution and understanding. The purpose is ...
textThis dissertation explores how argumentation theory can supplement models of responsible persuas...
Rhetoric, as an art of production, established a philosophically supervised theory focusing on its p...
On relationship between logic and rhetoric and on logical rules vs. rhetorical moves of debate. The ...
There are two interpretations of rhetoric that are backed by a long tradition: as the theory of argu...
In Argumentation Theory after the New Rhetoric, Frans H. van Eemeren characterizes the New Rhetoric ...
I make a distinction between a traditional conception of Rhetoric as a corpus of practical knowledge...
Since antiquity, the notion of rhetoric has been associated with Aristotle, Cicero and Quintilian. T...
A proper assessment of the relation between discourse structure and speaker's communicative int...
Since Aristotle, the study of rhetoric has focused on the persuasive aspect of discourse in the poli...
Theories of speech communication found their earliest expression in the writings of the ancient Gree...
Aristotle’s Rhetoric is a technical handbook for how to persuade a public audience about what is goo...
This book offers a new approach to the principles and functioning of rhetoric. In everyday life, we ...
In order to vindicate everyday, communicative discourse, in the face of incoherent, implausible st...
Rhetorical argumentation and linguistic argumentation Oswald Ducrot Among the numerous senses associ...
The following paper deals with the relationship between elocution and understanding. The purpose is ...
textThis dissertation explores how argumentation theory can supplement models of responsible persuas...
Rhetoric, as an art of production, established a philosophically supervised theory focusing on its p...
On relationship between logic and rhetoric and on logical rules vs. rhetorical moves of debate. The ...
There are two interpretations of rhetoric that are backed by a long tradition: as the theory of argu...
In Argumentation Theory after the New Rhetoric, Frans H. van Eemeren characterizes the New Rhetoric ...