This article discusses the English Court of Appeal case R v Collins, which set aside a High Court order that authorized a compulsory caesarian section on a pregnant woman against her express wishes. The author analyses the decision and considers its implications in New Zealand with regard to patient autonomy. The article concludes that, while a case like R v Collins seems unlikely in New Zealand, it is nonetheless a salutary warning to health professionals that no matter how unreasonable patients’ decisions may be, their right to refuse medical treatment is sacrosanct unless they lack the necessary competence at the time of making that decision
This article reconsiders the, now nine year old, House of Lords’ decision in Rees v. Darlington Memo...
This article considers the legal regulation of surrogacy in the United Kingdom and examines legislat...
This Article addresses the question of when, if ever, it is ethically and legally permissible to com...
This article discusses the English Court of Appeal case R v Collins, which set aside a High Court or...
In this thesis I aim to provide a balanced, unbiased analysis of the materno-fetal conflict as expre...
This Article reconsiders whether cases across the country which have compelled pregnant women to und...
The principle of patient self-determination has assumed central importance in British medical law in...
The article examines whether it is morally correct and legally possible to police a pregnant woman’s...
Informed consent is a fundamental precept of modern medical care and pertains in those situations wh...
Non-consensual contraceptive sterilisation of people with learning difficulties is inherently contro...
In this chapter we consider the role of the law in determining maternal responsibility for foetal we...
When someone has a learning disability, determining that person's capacity and, if necessary, their ...
Original article can be found at: http://www.herts.ac.uk/courses/schools-of-study/law/hertfordshire-...
In the United Kingdom women have access to termination of pregnancy for maternal reasons until 24 we...
This article considers the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom case Aintree University Hospitals NHS...
This article reconsiders the, now nine year old, House of Lords’ decision in Rees v. Darlington Memo...
This article considers the legal regulation of surrogacy in the United Kingdom and examines legislat...
This Article addresses the question of when, if ever, it is ethically and legally permissible to com...
This article discusses the English Court of Appeal case R v Collins, which set aside a High Court or...
In this thesis I aim to provide a balanced, unbiased analysis of the materno-fetal conflict as expre...
This Article reconsiders whether cases across the country which have compelled pregnant women to und...
The principle of patient self-determination has assumed central importance in British medical law in...
The article examines whether it is morally correct and legally possible to police a pregnant woman’s...
Informed consent is a fundamental precept of modern medical care and pertains in those situations wh...
Non-consensual contraceptive sterilisation of people with learning difficulties is inherently contro...
In this chapter we consider the role of the law in determining maternal responsibility for foetal we...
When someone has a learning disability, determining that person's capacity and, if necessary, their ...
Original article can be found at: http://www.herts.ac.uk/courses/schools-of-study/law/hertfordshire-...
In the United Kingdom women have access to termination of pregnancy for maternal reasons until 24 we...
This article considers the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom case Aintree University Hospitals NHS...
This article reconsiders the, now nine year old, House of Lords’ decision in Rees v. Darlington Memo...
This article considers the legal regulation of surrogacy in the United Kingdom and examines legislat...
This Article addresses the question of when, if ever, it is ethically and legally permissible to com...