This article discusses the English Court of Appeal case R v Collins, which set aside a High Court order that authorized a compulsory caesarian section on a pregnant woman against her express wishes. The author analyses the decision and considers its implications in New Zealand with regard to patient autonomy. The article concludes that, while a case like R v Collins seems unlikely in New Zealand, it is nonetheless a salutary warning to health professionals that no matter how unreasonable patients’ decisions may be, their right to refuse medical treatment is sacrosanct unless they lack the necessary competence at the time of making that decision
SummaryIn medicine, the vast majority of conscientious objection (CO) is exercised within the reprod...
Nelson (2018) criticizes conscientious objection to abortion statutes as far as they permit health c...
Termination of pregnancy [TOP] is one of the most sensitive and divisive issues in health care. Two ...
This article discusses the English Court of Appeal case R v Collins, which set aside a High Court or...
This Article reconsiders whether cases across the country which have compelled pregnant women to und...
The principle of patient self-determination has assumed central importance in British medical law in...
In this thesis I aim to provide a balanced, unbiased analysis of the materno-fetal conflict as expre...
In this article, through discussion of the more important cases involving the regulation of abortion...
To access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink at the bottom of the ...
Rationale, Aims and Objectives: Caesarean delivery carries a higher risk of shortand long‐term compl...
This article examines the law in Australia and New Zealand that governs the withholding and withdraw...
Informed consent is a fundamental precept of modern medical care and pertains in those situations wh...
The authors note significant room for improvement in facilitating informed consent in the management...
This article reconsiders the, now nine year old, House of Lords’ decision in Rees v. Darlington Memo...
In this paper I claim that the conscience clause around abortion provision in England, Scotland, and...
SummaryIn medicine, the vast majority of conscientious objection (CO) is exercised within the reprod...
Nelson (2018) criticizes conscientious objection to abortion statutes as far as they permit health c...
Termination of pregnancy [TOP] is one of the most sensitive and divisive issues in health care. Two ...
This article discusses the English Court of Appeal case R v Collins, which set aside a High Court or...
This Article reconsiders whether cases across the country which have compelled pregnant women to und...
The principle of patient self-determination has assumed central importance in British medical law in...
In this thesis I aim to provide a balanced, unbiased analysis of the materno-fetal conflict as expre...
In this article, through discussion of the more important cases involving the regulation of abortion...
To access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink at the bottom of the ...
Rationale, Aims and Objectives: Caesarean delivery carries a higher risk of shortand long‐term compl...
This article examines the law in Australia and New Zealand that governs the withholding and withdraw...
Informed consent is a fundamental precept of modern medical care and pertains in those situations wh...
The authors note significant room for improvement in facilitating informed consent in the management...
This article reconsiders the, now nine year old, House of Lords’ decision in Rees v. Darlington Memo...
In this paper I claim that the conscience clause around abortion provision in England, Scotland, and...
SummaryIn medicine, the vast majority of conscientious objection (CO) is exercised within the reprod...
Nelson (2018) criticizes conscientious objection to abortion statutes as far as they permit health c...
Termination of pregnancy [TOP] is one of the most sensitive and divisive issues in health care. Two ...