Add to ORKGThe Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that an audiotape played at a public preliminary criminal hearing was a public judicial record or document; therefore, it is subject to the presumption of openness, and the public is entitled to have access to review and copy such evidence. Commonwealth v. Upshur, 924 A.2d 642 (Pa. 2007)
The authors explore several areas of criminal law and criminal procedure, specifically, a defendant\...
Three new models of court recording system (Computer-Assisted Transcription Model, Digital Audio Rec...
Recently, the Oklahoma Supreme Court decided a case on the confidentiality of judicial and administr...
The Pennsylvania Superior Court has held that a trial court must consider the public\u27s right of a...
This Note advocates recognition of a constitutional right of press access to evidentiary recordings ...
Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia is, in the words of Justice Stevens, a watershed case. For t...
Recordings have been offered in evidence in a wide variety of cases, including an attempted bribery ...
A peripheral but hotly contested issue in the Abscam trials was whether the media could copy and bro...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the admission into evidence of extrajudicial statements mad...
The hearsay exception for public records was recognized at common law and has been further develop...
English and American common law have long recognized the public\u27s right of access to judicial rec...
Public accountability requires open proceedings and access to documents filed with the courts. The s...
Cameras are an understandable yet inapt target for Supreme Court Justices apprehensive about televis...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that a statute allowing children to testify outside the physi...
The Superior Court of Pennsylvania has held, sub silentio, that juror prejudice may be presumed and ...
The authors explore several areas of criminal law and criminal procedure, specifically, a defendant\...
Three new models of court recording system (Computer-Assisted Transcription Model, Digital Audio Rec...
Recently, the Oklahoma Supreme Court decided a case on the confidentiality of judicial and administr...
The Pennsylvania Superior Court has held that a trial court must consider the public\u27s right of a...
This Note advocates recognition of a constitutional right of press access to evidentiary recordings ...
Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia is, in the words of Justice Stevens, a watershed case. For t...
Recordings have been offered in evidence in a wide variety of cases, including an attempted bribery ...
A peripheral but hotly contested issue in the Abscam trials was whether the media could copy and bro...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the admission into evidence of extrajudicial statements mad...
The hearsay exception for public records was recognized at common law and has been further develop...
English and American common law have long recognized the public\u27s right of access to judicial rec...
Public accountability requires open proceedings and access to documents filed with the courts. The s...
Cameras are an understandable yet inapt target for Supreme Court Justices apprehensive about televis...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that a statute allowing children to testify outside the physi...
The Superior Court of Pennsylvania has held, sub silentio, that juror prejudice may be presumed and ...
The authors explore several areas of criminal law and criminal procedure, specifically, a defendant\...
Three new models of court recording system (Computer-Assisted Transcription Model, Digital Audio Rec...
Recently, the Oklahoma Supreme Court decided a case on the confidentiality of judicial and administr...