Add to ORKGA peripheral but hotly contested issue in the Abscam trials was whether the media could copy and broadcast the videotapes entered into evidence. This issue requires balancing of the defendant\u27s fair trial rights against interests closely analogous to those protected by the First Amendment. This note suggests the lines upon which analysis of the conflicting interests should run, and argues for a strong presumption in favor of access
The note examines the current law regarding media coverage of jury trials and the effect of such pub...
There is continuing concern in the United States about the kind of media storms that swirl around hi...
The rising importance of television journalism in the 1960\u27s has resulted in the Supreme Court de...
A peripheral but hotly contested issue in the Abscam trials was whether the media could copy and bro...
This Note advocates recognition of a constitutional right of press access to evidentiary recordings ...
As public access to inexpensive and versatile camcorders grows, U.S. courts face a new source of c...
This Note analyzes the conflicting interests involved in televising state criminal trials and propos...
Videotape presentations in courtroom proceedings are admissible upon the proper foundation of accura...
Florida is one of the pioneer states using videotape as evidence in the courtroom.\u2
For several years there has been an ongoing dispute between members of the media and members of the ...
The Supreme Court recently handed down a unanimous decision dealing with the respective rights of th...
There is continuing concern in the United States about the kind of media storms that swirl around h...
Legislation recently enacted in California attempts to preserve further the right of the accused to ...
This work sets out the constitutional, statutory, and common law applicable to television’s intrusio...
Over the past twenty years, most American courthouses have been wired with audio and video recording...
The note examines the current law regarding media coverage of jury trials and the effect of such pub...
There is continuing concern in the United States about the kind of media storms that swirl around hi...
The rising importance of television journalism in the 1960\u27s has resulted in the Supreme Court de...
A peripheral but hotly contested issue in the Abscam trials was whether the media could copy and bro...
This Note advocates recognition of a constitutional right of press access to evidentiary recordings ...
As public access to inexpensive and versatile camcorders grows, U.S. courts face a new source of c...
This Note analyzes the conflicting interests involved in televising state criminal trials and propos...
Videotape presentations in courtroom proceedings are admissible upon the proper foundation of accura...
Florida is one of the pioneer states using videotape as evidence in the courtroom.\u2
For several years there has been an ongoing dispute between members of the media and members of the ...
The Supreme Court recently handed down a unanimous decision dealing with the respective rights of th...
There is continuing concern in the United States about the kind of media storms that swirl around h...
Legislation recently enacted in California attempts to preserve further the right of the accused to ...
This work sets out the constitutional, statutory, and common law applicable to television’s intrusio...
Over the past twenty years, most American courthouses have been wired with audio and video recording...
The note examines the current law regarding media coverage of jury trials and the effect of such pub...
There is continuing concern in the United States about the kind of media storms that swirl around hi...
The rising importance of television journalism in the 1960\u27s has resulted in the Supreme Court de...