Add to ORKGThe United States Supreme Court held that attorney\u27s fees are to be awarded to the prevailing party only at the discretion of the court, and that prevailing plaintiffs and prevailing defendants should be treated the same. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc., 114 S. Ct. 1023 (1994)
Since its inception, litigation finance has steadily grown in prevalence and popularity in the Unite...
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in two patent infringement cases that both concern shifting of ...
In a 2006 decision, eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., the U.S. Supreme Court held that traditional ...
Section 505 of the Copyright Act allows courts to award attorney’s fees to the prevailing party in a...
The United States Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley \u26 Sons resolved a disa...
The United States Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley \u26 Sons resolved a disa...
Title 17, section 505 of the United States Code allows a court, in its discretion, to award reasonab...
On March 4, 2019, the Supreme Court decided two separate cases which will change how copyright infri...
Copyright law exists to promote the progress of art and science. It achieves this by balancing limit...
Section 505 of the Copyright Act of 1909 was carried forth, without substantive change, into the Cop...
Until recently, the question of whether §43 of the Lanham Act prevented the unaccredited copying of ...
The United States Supreme Court held that where statutory remedies are more analogous to those histo...
A recent Federal District Court case , Grove Press, Inc. v. Collector\u27s Publication, Inc., illust...
In 1983 and 1984 the federal courts continued to interpret the changes in copyright law effectuated ...
This Article demonstrates that one important goal of copyright infringement cases is the achievement...
Since its inception, litigation finance has steadily grown in prevalence and popularity in the Unite...
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in two patent infringement cases that both concern shifting of ...
In a 2006 decision, eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., the U.S. Supreme Court held that traditional ...
Section 505 of the Copyright Act allows courts to award attorney’s fees to the prevailing party in a...
The United States Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley \u26 Sons resolved a disa...
The United States Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley \u26 Sons resolved a disa...
Title 17, section 505 of the United States Code allows a court, in its discretion, to award reasonab...
On March 4, 2019, the Supreme Court decided two separate cases which will change how copyright infri...
Copyright law exists to promote the progress of art and science. It achieves this by balancing limit...
Section 505 of the Copyright Act of 1909 was carried forth, without substantive change, into the Cop...
Until recently, the question of whether §43 of the Lanham Act prevented the unaccredited copying of ...
The United States Supreme Court held that where statutory remedies are more analogous to those histo...
A recent Federal District Court case , Grove Press, Inc. v. Collector\u27s Publication, Inc., illust...
In 1983 and 1984 the federal courts continued to interpret the changes in copyright law effectuated ...
This Article demonstrates that one important goal of copyright infringement cases is the achievement...
Since its inception, litigation finance has steadily grown in prevalence and popularity in the Unite...
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in two patent infringement cases that both concern shifting of ...
In a 2006 decision, eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., the U.S. Supreme Court held that traditional ...