Add to ORKGThe United States Supreme Court has held that the failure of a state operated child protection agency to provide adequate protection to a child from his parent\u27s violence does not violate that child\u27s rights under the substantive component of the Due Process Clause. Deshaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of Social Servs., 489 U.S. ___, 109 S. Ct. 998 (1989)
Over 150 years ago, Congress passed and the states ratified the Fourteenth Amendment, banning states...
Due Process—CLAIMS OF ABUSED CHILDREN AGAINST STATE PROTECTIVE AGENCIES--THE STATE\u27S RESPONSIBILI...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that child placement agreements voluntarily executed by p...
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has held that a juvenile i...
The Supreme Court of the United States held that a Kansas statute providing for civil commitment of ...
The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution protect a parent\u27s custodial rights....
This Note reviews the legal landscape of Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process theory promulg...
After Sharwline Nicholson was assaulted by her boyfriend for the first time, the Administration for ...
In our system of government, the Constitution has conferred a guarantees of certain rights to its ci...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has held that a public school student seve...
This article discusses the jurisdictional power of state courts to adjudicate family law disputes in...
The purpose of this Article is to analyze the Santosky presupposition and demonstrate why it is misd...
DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services is the Supreme Court\u27s first major eff...
This article begins by asking what constitutional provision is violated by the enforcement of law wi...
The Ninth Circuit reaffirmed in Fields v. Palmdale School District that the constitutional due proc...
Over 150 years ago, Congress passed and the states ratified the Fourteenth Amendment, banning states...
Due Process—CLAIMS OF ABUSED CHILDREN AGAINST STATE PROTECTIVE AGENCIES--THE STATE\u27S RESPONSIBILI...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that child placement agreements voluntarily executed by p...
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has held that a juvenile i...
The Supreme Court of the United States held that a Kansas statute providing for civil commitment of ...
The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution protect a parent\u27s custodial rights....
This Note reviews the legal landscape of Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process theory promulg...
After Sharwline Nicholson was assaulted by her boyfriend for the first time, the Administration for ...
In our system of government, the Constitution has conferred a guarantees of certain rights to its ci...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has held that a public school student seve...
This article discusses the jurisdictional power of state courts to adjudicate family law disputes in...
The purpose of this Article is to analyze the Santosky presupposition and demonstrate why it is misd...
DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services is the Supreme Court\u27s first major eff...
This article begins by asking what constitutional provision is violated by the enforcement of law wi...
The Ninth Circuit reaffirmed in Fields v. Palmdale School District that the constitutional due proc...
Over 150 years ago, Congress passed and the states ratified the Fourteenth Amendment, banning states...
Due Process—CLAIMS OF ABUSED CHILDREN AGAINST STATE PROTECTIVE AGENCIES--THE STATE\u27S RESPONSIBILI...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that child placement agreements voluntarily executed by p...