Add to ORKGThe United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has held that a juvenile is entitled to procedural due process protection, including a probable cause hearing and a post-commitment hearing, when his parents commit him to an institution. Bartley v. Kremens, 402 F. Supp. 1039 (E.D. Pa. 1975), vacated and remanded, 45 U.S.L.W. 4451 (U.S. May 16, 1977)
After the decisions in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335 (1963), Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436...
The landmark Supreme Court decision in In re Gault established, among other things, a juvenile\u27s ...
Kent v. United States required trial courts to conduct an individualized assessment before transferr...
The United States Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of Pennsylvania\u27s voluntary admi...
Bartley v. Kremens, 402 F. Supp. 1039 (E.D. Pa. 1975). Children\u27s Rights in Mental Commitments E...
Fourteenth Amendment rights of due process and equal protection have continually demanded the attent...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that child placement agreements voluntarily executed by p...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that where a juvenile is charged with the commission...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has held that a public school student seve...
The United States Supreme Court has held that the failure of a state operated child protection agenc...
For over sixty years, courts consistently found notions of due process inapplicable in juvenile proc...
I. Introduction II. Leading Supreme Court Cases Defining Procedural Due Process Rights of Juveniles ...
The origins of Juvenile courts are traced to the chancery, established and erected in England in the...
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has held that the court ne...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that the right to trial by jury in a juvenile proceeding ...
After the decisions in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335 (1963), Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436...
The landmark Supreme Court decision in In re Gault established, among other things, a juvenile\u27s ...
Kent v. United States required trial courts to conduct an individualized assessment before transferr...
The United States Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of Pennsylvania\u27s voluntary admi...
Bartley v. Kremens, 402 F. Supp. 1039 (E.D. Pa. 1975). Children\u27s Rights in Mental Commitments E...
Fourteenth Amendment rights of due process and equal protection have continually demanded the attent...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that child placement agreements voluntarily executed by p...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that where a juvenile is charged with the commission...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has held that a public school student seve...
The United States Supreme Court has held that the failure of a state operated child protection agenc...
For over sixty years, courts consistently found notions of due process inapplicable in juvenile proc...
I. Introduction II. Leading Supreme Court Cases Defining Procedural Due Process Rights of Juveniles ...
The origins of Juvenile courts are traced to the chancery, established and erected in England in the...
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has held that the court ne...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that the right to trial by jury in a juvenile proceeding ...
After the decisions in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335 (1963), Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436...
The landmark Supreme Court decision in In re Gault established, among other things, a juvenile\u27s ...
Kent v. United States required trial courts to conduct an individualized assessment before transferr...