Add to ORKGThe recent decision of the High Court of Australia in Prince Alfred College v ADC is a landmark case in the law of vicarious liability. It is the first time in almost 14 years that the High Court has grappled in earnest with the second stage of the test for vicarious liability. This note observes that Prince Alfred College charts a far more restrictive course for the vicarious liability doctrine than has been followed by UK courts. It examines the different trajectories of the law in Australia and the UK and explores possible reasons for this difference
In general, as is well known, while an employer can be held vicariously liable for wrongs committed ...
Until 2017, Irish law regarding vicarious liability was at odds with a broad trend throughout the co...
This thesis presents an examination of the historical developments of vicarious liability law in th...
The recent decision of the High Court of Australia in Prince Alfred College v ADC is a landmark case...
Vicarious liability (respondeat superior) is a venerable common law doctrine which holds an employer...
This article calls for a reconsideration of the doctrine of vicarious liability. I argue that the d...
The doctrine of vicarious liability has its roots in the early common law, with its core elements co...
This article uses Atiyah and Summer’s categorisation of the attributes of formal legal reasoning in ...
The Australian High Court’s 6:1 decision in New South Wales v Lepore has set the law on whether an e...
This thesis is an analysis of the law of vicarious liability and its application within the legal fr...
The theory of enterprise risk is increasingly being utilised to justify the imposition of vicarious ...
Two complimentary decisions of the Supreme Court have provided the opportunity to review the require...
Vicarious liability has a greater reach within both professional and amateur football than previousl...
The Supreme Court’s decision in Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council [2017] UKSC 60; [2017] 3 W.L....
The availability of compensation for loss of chance in clinical negligence cases appeared to be avai...
In general, as is well known, while an employer can be held vicariously liable for wrongs committed ...
Until 2017, Irish law regarding vicarious liability was at odds with a broad trend throughout the co...
This thesis presents an examination of the historical developments of vicarious liability law in th...
The recent decision of the High Court of Australia in Prince Alfred College v ADC is a landmark case...
Vicarious liability (respondeat superior) is a venerable common law doctrine which holds an employer...
This article calls for a reconsideration of the doctrine of vicarious liability. I argue that the d...
The doctrine of vicarious liability has its roots in the early common law, with its core elements co...
This article uses Atiyah and Summer’s categorisation of the attributes of formal legal reasoning in ...
The Australian High Court’s 6:1 decision in New South Wales v Lepore has set the law on whether an e...
This thesis is an analysis of the law of vicarious liability and its application within the legal fr...
The theory of enterprise risk is increasingly being utilised to justify the imposition of vicarious ...
Two complimentary decisions of the Supreme Court have provided the opportunity to review the require...
Vicarious liability has a greater reach within both professional and amateur football than previousl...
The Supreme Court’s decision in Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council [2017] UKSC 60; [2017] 3 W.L....
The availability of compensation for loss of chance in clinical negligence cases appeared to be avai...
In general, as is well known, while an employer can be held vicariously liable for wrongs committed ...
Until 2017, Irish law regarding vicarious liability was at odds with a broad trend throughout the co...
This thesis presents an examination of the historical developments of vicarious liability law in th...