The theory of enterprise risk is increasingly being utilised to justify the imposition of vicarious liability upon an employer. Under this theory costs associated with ordinary risks of business are allocated to an employer, regardless of fault. It has been adopted and applied by courts in the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States. The article argues the Australian High Court has been correct to refuse to adopt such an approach. It is contrary to fault-based liability upon which much tort law depends, and is not justified by a deterrence rationale
This article identifies two paradigms of vicarious liability. One is an established paradigm of ‘lib...
An employer's delictual liability can be either personal or vicarious. Vicarious liability is a form...
The long-standing dichotomy between employees and independent contractors in vicarious liability - n...
The enterprise risk theory has gained prominence as an attempted justification and rationalisation f...
grantor: University of TorontoThis thesis examines the impact two recent Supreme Court of ...
This book provides a critical discussion of the current law of vicarious liability. It argues the d...
Vicarious liability (respondeat superior) is a venerable common law doctrine which holds an employer...
This article calls for a reconsideration of the doctrine of vicarious liability. I argue that the d...
In the U.S., employers' vicarious liability refers to cases in which an employer is held respons...
abstract Vicarious liability is usually the absolute liability of employer for mis-conduct of the ag...
This article seeks to explore the pressing unanswered commercial issue: whether or not a parent comp...
It is tempting to think that the problem with corporate responsibility, and liability, is that there...
The Australian High Court’s 6:1 decision in New South Wales v Lepore has set the law on whether an e...
In general, as is well known, while an employer can be held vicariously liable for wrongs committed ...
Through an analysis of recent case law, this article seeks to highlight the flaws in the current Eng...
This article identifies two paradigms of vicarious liability. One is an established paradigm of ‘lib...
An employer's delictual liability can be either personal or vicarious. Vicarious liability is a form...
The long-standing dichotomy between employees and independent contractors in vicarious liability - n...
The enterprise risk theory has gained prominence as an attempted justification and rationalisation f...
grantor: University of TorontoThis thesis examines the impact two recent Supreme Court of ...
This book provides a critical discussion of the current law of vicarious liability. It argues the d...
Vicarious liability (respondeat superior) is a venerable common law doctrine which holds an employer...
This article calls for a reconsideration of the doctrine of vicarious liability. I argue that the d...
In the U.S., employers' vicarious liability refers to cases in which an employer is held respons...
abstract Vicarious liability is usually the absolute liability of employer for mis-conduct of the ag...
This article seeks to explore the pressing unanswered commercial issue: whether or not a parent comp...
It is tempting to think that the problem with corporate responsibility, and liability, is that there...
The Australian High Court’s 6:1 decision in New South Wales v Lepore has set the law on whether an e...
In general, as is well known, while an employer can be held vicariously liable for wrongs committed ...
Through an analysis of recent case law, this article seeks to highlight the flaws in the current Eng...
This article identifies two paradigms of vicarious liability. One is an established paradigm of ‘lib...
An employer's delictual liability can be either personal or vicarious. Vicarious liability is a form...
The long-standing dichotomy between employees and independent contractors in vicarious liability - n...