Add to ORKGWhat is an I.E. Judging Philosophy? It is a series of written statements concerning how the judge views Individual Events in general, variables in each events, and views concerning decision-making. It is a tool that judges, coaches, and graduate assistants can use to develop their views and attitudes concerning judging criteria. In addition, it can serve as a discussion starter for forensics classes, conferences, and graduate assistant training sessions. It is not intended to be shared with competitors ( as in debate)
It has been said that forensics should be viewed as humanistic education. Forensic educators are to ...
Throughout most modern and contemporary legal scholarship there appears an unbridgeable division bet...
Recommendations from the Rational for Events to be Included in All I.E. Competition session at the F...
The judging of individual events has long been fraught with difficulty, with critics invoking their ...
This article provides a tournament di-rector with a self-contained judge training packet that can be...
This paper proposes one approach to those problems and suggests how it could improve judging, as wel...
The judging of individual events is a difficult task. Perhaps it is exceeded in difficulty by instru...
To approach this task. I will have three sections to this paper. In the first section I will discuss...
Recommendations from the Standards for Evaluation/Judging sessions at the First Developmental Confer...
Forensics would benefit from utilizing more nontraditional judges at tournaments. The paper argues f...
Before developing some standards for evaluating/judging individual events, it is necessary to unders...
In this lecture the author notes that in order for judges to be seen to dispense justice they must p...
Why does the typical individual events tournament include the specific event categories that it does...
From the introduction: As legal theorists, we live in an age of self-conscious repetition: everythin...
We will focus upon three events that are of particular concern or interest to us -- Informative, Per...
It has been said that forensics should be viewed as humanistic education. Forensic educators are to ...
Throughout most modern and contemporary legal scholarship there appears an unbridgeable division bet...
Recommendations from the Rational for Events to be Included in All I.E. Competition session at the F...
The judging of individual events has long been fraught with difficulty, with critics invoking their ...
This article provides a tournament di-rector with a self-contained judge training packet that can be...
This paper proposes one approach to those problems and suggests how it could improve judging, as wel...
The judging of individual events is a difficult task. Perhaps it is exceeded in difficulty by instru...
To approach this task. I will have three sections to this paper. In the first section I will discuss...
Recommendations from the Standards for Evaluation/Judging sessions at the First Developmental Confer...
Forensics would benefit from utilizing more nontraditional judges at tournaments. The paper argues f...
Before developing some standards for evaluating/judging individual events, it is necessary to unders...
In this lecture the author notes that in order for judges to be seen to dispense justice they must p...
Why does the typical individual events tournament include the specific event categories that it does...
From the introduction: As legal theorists, we live in an age of self-conscious repetition: everythin...
We will focus upon three events that are of particular concern or interest to us -- Informative, Per...
It has been said that forensics should be viewed as humanistic education. Forensic educators are to ...
Throughout most modern and contemporary legal scholarship there appears an unbridgeable division bet...
Recommendations from the Rational for Events to be Included in All I.E. Competition session at the F...