Add to ORKGThis article provides a tournament di-rector with a self-contained judge training packet that can be copied and handed to judges or modified with your tournament specific information. This article ex-plains the mechanics of judging Individual Events, Parliamentary Debate, and Lincoln-Douglas Debate by providing lay judges with help in terms of how to express their thoughts about the event they just watched. The following material does not, nor should any judge training, mandate what is good or bad in a perfor-mance, but rather describes how to provide valuable feedback based on their ed-ucated reactions to the performances
In a time when forensics is trying to maintain traditions while not getting stuck in a performance r...
Since the creation of Communication Analysis/Rhetorical Criticism as an event in competitive college...
The problem of securing competent judges of debate is always with us. \u27 This statement is as true...
The judging of individual events is a difficult task. Perhaps it is exceeded in difficulty by instru...
This paper proposes one approach to those problems and suggests how it could improve judging, as wel...
Forensics would benefit from utilizing more nontraditional judges at tournaments. The paper argues f...
Recommendations from the session on the use of workshops for training coaches and judges at the Firs...
What is an I.E. Judging Philosophy? It is a series of written statements concerning how the judge vi...
The judging of individual events has long been fraught with difficulty, with critics invoking their ...
This paper will support the thesis that more training of forensics coaches and judges, whether forma...
Lay jurors are often legally and logically unprepared for trial. In response, it is recommended that...
The University of Minnesota Law School and the Minnesota Supreme Court Office of Continuing Educatio...
The judge’s ballot, within the forensic community, is used as an educational tool. Yet, the tool is ...
In collegiate mock trial competition, practicing attorneys who don’t coach or know the participating...
If we conclude that veteran coaches and judges have had little or no formal training, and novice coa...
In a time when forensics is trying to maintain traditions while not getting stuck in a performance r...
Since the creation of Communication Analysis/Rhetorical Criticism as an event in competitive college...
The problem of securing competent judges of debate is always with us. \u27 This statement is as true...
The judging of individual events is a difficult task. Perhaps it is exceeded in difficulty by instru...
This paper proposes one approach to those problems and suggests how it could improve judging, as wel...
Forensics would benefit from utilizing more nontraditional judges at tournaments. The paper argues f...
Recommendations from the session on the use of workshops for training coaches and judges at the Firs...
What is an I.E. Judging Philosophy? It is a series of written statements concerning how the judge vi...
The judging of individual events has long been fraught with difficulty, with critics invoking their ...
This paper will support the thesis that more training of forensics coaches and judges, whether forma...
Lay jurors are often legally and logically unprepared for trial. In response, it is recommended that...
The University of Minnesota Law School and the Minnesota Supreme Court Office of Continuing Educatio...
The judge’s ballot, within the forensic community, is used as an educational tool. Yet, the tool is ...
In collegiate mock trial competition, practicing attorneys who don’t coach or know the participating...
If we conclude that veteran coaches and judges have had little or no formal training, and novice coa...
In a time when forensics is trying to maintain traditions while not getting stuck in a performance r...
Since the creation of Communication Analysis/Rhetorical Criticism as an event in competitive college...
The problem of securing competent judges of debate is always with us. \u27 This statement is as true...