Mikhalevich & Powell (M&P) set up the basic criteria for according moral status equitably, including the capacity for affect. They argue persuasively against assuming that all invertebrates are insentient and hence ineligible for moral consideration. In addition to the relatively clear case of cephalopods, various arthropods may prove to be sentient. We should be aware of various sources of prejudice that M&P discuss and not assume that it would be absurd to attribute sentience and moral status to certain invertebrates
Mikhalevich & Powell (2020) argue that we should attribute moral standing not only to vertebrates bu...
Invertebrate animals are frequently lumped into a single category and denied welfare protections des...
In common with most other authors, Mikhalevich & Powell assume that phenomenal consciousness is a “p...
Mikhalevich & Powell (M&P) set up the basic criteria for according moral status equitably, including...
Mikhalevich & Powell provide convincing empirical evidence that at least some invertebrates are sent...
We appreciate the goals of Mikhalevich & Powell (M&P) and largely agree with their conclusions but w...
All animal species have adapted for survival and no species is superior overall. For cognitive capac...
Welfare protections for vertebrates are grounded in the belief that vertebrates are sentient and cap...
Whether or not arthropods are sentient, they can have moral standing. Appeals to sentience are not n...
There is no way to include invertebrates within the moral sphere without being “extreme” — to use Mi...
Mikhalevich & Powell argue that the exclusion of the vast majority of arthropods from moral standing...
Mikhalevich & Powell (2020) argue that it is wrong, both scientifically and morally, to dismiss the ...
This paper argues that navigating insects and spiders possess a degree of mindedness that makes them...
Mikhalevich & Powell (2020) argue that we should attribute moral standing not only to vertebrates bu...
Invertebrate animals are frequently lumped into a single category and denied welfare protections des...
In common with most other authors, Mikhalevich & Powell assume that phenomenal consciousness is a “p...
Mikhalevich & Powell (M&P) set up the basic criteria for according moral status equitably, including...
Mikhalevich & Powell provide convincing empirical evidence that at least some invertebrates are sent...
We appreciate the goals of Mikhalevich & Powell (M&P) and largely agree with their conclusions but w...
All animal species have adapted for survival and no species is superior overall. For cognitive capac...
Welfare protections for vertebrates are grounded in the belief that vertebrates are sentient and cap...
Whether or not arthropods are sentient, they can have moral standing. Appeals to sentience are not n...
There is no way to include invertebrates within the moral sphere without being “extreme” — to use Mi...
Mikhalevich & Powell argue that the exclusion of the vast majority of arthropods from moral standing...
Mikhalevich & Powell (2020) argue that it is wrong, both scientifically and morally, to dismiss the ...
This paper argues that navigating insects and spiders possess a degree of mindedness that makes them...
Mikhalevich & Powell (2020) argue that we should attribute moral standing not only to vertebrates bu...
Invertebrate animals are frequently lumped into a single category and denied welfare protections des...
In common with most other authors, Mikhalevich & Powell assume that phenomenal consciousness is a “p...