Chapman & Huffman reject the notion that human beings are very different from other animals. The goal is to undermine the claim that human uniqueness and even superiority are reason enough to treat other animals badly. But evaluating human uniqueness for this purpose only plays into the hands of those who exploit invidious comparisons between us and other animals to justify mistreatment of the rest of the animal kingdom. What human uniqueness we may discover would still be no justification for how we behave toward other animals. We should also ask ourselves whether any human-centric criterion can be justification for determining who deserves moral regard. Is it possible, and even preferable, to think about who is entitled to our moral conce...
Chapman & Huffman suggest that to correct our thinking about the supposed superiority of humans over...
Our commentators come from many fields and disciplines and express highly divergent views, illustrat...
Animal rights philosophers have traditionally accepted the claim that human beings are unique, but r...
Chapman & Huffman reject the notion that human beings are very different from other animals. The goa...
Chapman & Huffman attack the idea that humans are unique and therefore superior to nonhuman beings. ...
One harmful consequence of creating categories where one group is unique and superior to others is t...
Chapman & Huffman (C&H) offer a theory of why we humans want to believe that we are different: to ju...
This commentary discusses various shortcomings in Chapman & Huffman’s (2018) denial of differences b...
Chapman & Huffman argue that humans are neither unique nor superior to other animals. I believe they...
Chapman & Huffman (C & H) might be taken to argue as follows: Humans may treat animals however they ...
Chapman & Huffman make use of observations and studies that show how humans may not be as unique in ...
Identifying specific traits to justify according differential moral status to humans and non-human a...
Chapman & Huffman argue that humans inflict cruelty without apparent concern because of their catego...
Chapman & Huffman (2018) argue that we should not consider humans as unique or superior to other ani...
Chapman & Huffman suggest that we might change people’s behavior toward animals by resisting an argu...
Chapman & Huffman suggest that to correct our thinking about the supposed superiority of humans over...
Our commentators come from many fields and disciplines and express highly divergent views, illustrat...
Animal rights philosophers have traditionally accepted the claim that human beings are unique, but r...
Chapman & Huffman reject the notion that human beings are very different from other animals. The goa...
Chapman & Huffman attack the idea that humans are unique and therefore superior to nonhuman beings. ...
One harmful consequence of creating categories where one group is unique and superior to others is t...
Chapman & Huffman (C&H) offer a theory of why we humans want to believe that we are different: to ju...
This commentary discusses various shortcomings in Chapman & Huffman’s (2018) denial of differences b...
Chapman & Huffman argue that humans are neither unique nor superior to other animals. I believe they...
Chapman & Huffman (C & H) might be taken to argue as follows: Humans may treat animals however they ...
Chapman & Huffman make use of observations and studies that show how humans may not be as unique in ...
Identifying specific traits to justify according differential moral status to humans and non-human a...
Chapman & Huffman argue that humans inflict cruelty without apparent concern because of their catego...
Chapman & Huffman (2018) argue that we should not consider humans as unique or superior to other ani...
Chapman & Huffman suggest that we might change people’s behavior toward animals by resisting an argu...
Chapman & Huffman suggest that to correct our thinking about the supposed superiority of humans over...
Our commentators come from many fields and disciplines and express highly divergent views, illustrat...
Animal rights philosophers have traditionally accepted the claim that human beings are unique, but r...