Animal rights philosophers have traditionally accepted the claim that human beings are unique, but rejected the claim that our uniqueness justifies denying animals moral rights. Humans were thought to be unique specifically because we possess moral agency. In this commentary, I explore the claim that some nonhuman animals are also moral agents, and I take note of its counter-intuitive implications
Chapman & Huffman reject the notion that human beings are very different from other animals. The goa...
Debates in applied ethics about the proper treatment of animals often refer to empirical data about ...
Debates in applied ethics about the proper treatment of animals often refer to empirical data about ...
Animal rights philosophers have traditionally accepted the claim that human beings are unique, but r...
Animal rights philosophers have traditionally accepted the claim that human beings are unique, but r...
Animal rights philosophers have traditionally accepted the claim that human beings are unique, but r...
Animal rights philosophers have traditionally accepted the claim that human beings are unique, but r...
Is morality uniquely human or does morality exist in at least some non-human animals? Are animals fu...
Is morality uniquely human or does morality exist in at least some non-human animals? Are animals fu...
Is morality uniquely human or does morality exist in at least some non-human animals? Are animals fu...
Is morality uniquely human or does morality exist in at least some non-human animals? Are animals fu...
My paper discusses the philosophical issue of animals and ethics. The question that I explore involv...
Humans have long considered themselves unique in the animal kingdom. However, assumptions about huma...
This commentary discusses various shortcomings in Chapman & Huffman’s (2018) denial of differences b...
Various empirical and anecdotal accounts suggest that certain non-human animals behave in ways that ...
Chapman & Huffman reject the notion that human beings are very different from other animals. The goa...
Debates in applied ethics about the proper treatment of animals often refer to empirical data about ...
Debates in applied ethics about the proper treatment of animals often refer to empirical data about ...
Animal rights philosophers have traditionally accepted the claim that human beings are unique, but r...
Animal rights philosophers have traditionally accepted the claim that human beings are unique, but r...
Animal rights philosophers have traditionally accepted the claim that human beings are unique, but r...
Animal rights philosophers have traditionally accepted the claim that human beings are unique, but r...
Is morality uniquely human or does morality exist in at least some non-human animals? Are animals fu...
Is morality uniquely human or does morality exist in at least some non-human animals? Are animals fu...
Is morality uniquely human or does morality exist in at least some non-human animals? Are animals fu...
Is morality uniquely human or does morality exist in at least some non-human animals? Are animals fu...
My paper discusses the philosophical issue of animals and ethics. The question that I explore involv...
Humans have long considered themselves unique in the animal kingdom. However, assumptions about huma...
This commentary discusses various shortcomings in Chapman & Huffman’s (2018) denial of differences b...
Various empirical and anecdotal accounts suggest that certain non-human animals behave in ways that ...
Chapman & Huffman reject the notion that human beings are very different from other animals. The goa...
Debates in applied ethics about the proper treatment of animals often refer to empirical data about ...
Debates in applied ethics about the proper treatment of animals often refer to empirical data about ...