Add to ORKGA hypothesis like Key’s, that fish cannot feel pain, should really be stated as a null hypothesis — an assumption that there is no difference in the things being compared. Then evidence — including anecdotal evidence — for and against rejecting the null hypothesis can be examined and weighed. Key (2016a) has proven only that fish lack mammalian brains
Key’s (2016) discussion of his claim that fish do not feel pain ignores the history of attempts to s...
Key’s (2016) target article, “Why fish do not feel pain,” is based on a moralistic fallacy where con...
Bertrand Russell famously imagined the existence of a celestial teapot to highlight that the burden ...
A hypothesis like Key’s, that fish cannot feel pain, should really be stated as a null hypothesis — ...
Key (2016) claims that fish do not feel pain because they lack the neural structures that have a con...
Key (2016) claims that fish do not feel pain because they lack the neural structures that have a con...
Key (2016) argues that fish do not feel pain based on neuroanatomical evidence. I argue that Key mak...
The reader of Animal Sentience may surmise that because the weight of the commentaries on my target ...
Key (2016) affirms that we do not know how the fish brain processes pain but denies — because fish l...
Do fish consciously feel pain? Addressing this question, Key (2016) asks whether the neural mechanis...
Key\u27s (2016) arguments against the view that fish feel pain can be shown to be fallacious by cons...
In his target article, Key (2016) reviews the neuroanatomy of human pain and uses what is known abou...
Key’s (2016) target article provides some strong arguments but also makes some logical mistakes. The...
Some contemporary scientists are using comparative neurobiological data to argue that non-mammalian ...
Debate about the possibility of fish pain focuses largely on the fish’s lack of the cortex considere...
Key’s (2016) discussion of his claim that fish do not feel pain ignores the history of attempts to s...
Key’s (2016) target article, “Why fish do not feel pain,” is based on a moralistic fallacy where con...
Bertrand Russell famously imagined the existence of a celestial teapot to highlight that the burden ...
A hypothesis like Key’s, that fish cannot feel pain, should really be stated as a null hypothesis — ...
Key (2016) claims that fish do not feel pain because they lack the neural structures that have a con...
Key (2016) claims that fish do not feel pain because they lack the neural structures that have a con...
Key (2016) argues that fish do not feel pain based on neuroanatomical evidence. I argue that Key mak...
The reader of Animal Sentience may surmise that because the weight of the commentaries on my target ...
Key (2016) affirms that we do not know how the fish brain processes pain but denies — because fish l...
Do fish consciously feel pain? Addressing this question, Key (2016) asks whether the neural mechanis...
Key\u27s (2016) arguments against the view that fish feel pain can be shown to be fallacious by cons...
In his target article, Key (2016) reviews the neuroanatomy of human pain and uses what is known abou...
Key’s (2016) target article provides some strong arguments but also makes some logical mistakes. The...
Some contemporary scientists are using comparative neurobiological data to argue that non-mammalian ...
Debate about the possibility of fish pain focuses largely on the fish’s lack of the cortex considere...
Key’s (2016) discussion of his claim that fish do not feel pain ignores the history of attempts to s...
Key’s (2016) target article, “Why fish do not feel pain,” is based on a moralistic fallacy where con...
Bertrand Russell famously imagined the existence of a celestial teapot to highlight that the burden ...