Add to ORKGThis article is the third in a series on the implications for employee benefit plans of the Supreme Court’s decisions on the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and state bans on same-sex marriage. In this article, Kennedy highlights the effect Obergefell v. Hodges will have on employee benefit plans
Many employers provide domestic partner benefits to their employees, especially in the form of healt...
Last week, the Senate Judiciary Committee held hearings on the impact the federal Defense of Marriag...
Article published in the Michigan State University School of Law Student Scholarship Collection
This report will provide an overview of the potential federal tax implications for same-sex married ...
The article focuses on an issue that is shaping up to be the new front in the same-sex marriage wars...
(DOMA) is unconstitutional. As a result of the Supreme Court’s decision, the United States Office of...
The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) prohibits the recognition of same-sex marriages for any purpose u...
As I discussed in Part One of this two-part series of columns for Justia’s Verdict, the new bill wou...
The Supreme Court’s two recent decisions ( Windsor and Hollingsworth ) holding that Section 3 of the...
This Emerging Issues Analysis discusses the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Ho...
In June 2015, in Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court of the United States determined that there ...
It seems clear that the Framers of the Constitution of the United States believed that laws defining...
In United States v. Windsor, the Supreme Court struck down section three of the federal Defense of M...
It is longstanding tradition for the Secretary of the ABA\u27s Labor and Employment Law Section to p...
At the present time, same-sex marriage is permitted in six states, while civil unions or domestic pa...
Many employers provide domestic partner benefits to their employees, especially in the form of healt...
Last week, the Senate Judiciary Committee held hearings on the impact the federal Defense of Marriag...
Article published in the Michigan State University School of Law Student Scholarship Collection
This report will provide an overview of the potential federal tax implications for same-sex married ...
The article focuses on an issue that is shaping up to be the new front in the same-sex marriage wars...
(DOMA) is unconstitutional. As a result of the Supreme Court’s decision, the United States Office of...
The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) prohibits the recognition of same-sex marriages for any purpose u...
As I discussed in Part One of this two-part series of columns for Justia’s Verdict, the new bill wou...
The Supreme Court’s two recent decisions ( Windsor and Hollingsworth ) holding that Section 3 of the...
This Emerging Issues Analysis discusses the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Ho...
In June 2015, in Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court of the United States determined that there ...
It seems clear that the Framers of the Constitution of the United States believed that laws defining...
In United States v. Windsor, the Supreme Court struck down section three of the federal Defense of M...
It is longstanding tradition for the Secretary of the ABA\u27s Labor and Employment Law Section to p...
At the present time, same-sex marriage is permitted in six states, while civil unions or domestic pa...
Many employers provide domestic partner benefits to their employees, especially in the form of healt...
Last week, the Senate Judiciary Committee held hearings on the impact the federal Defense of Marriag...
Article published in the Michigan State University School of Law Student Scholarship Collection