Add to ORKG(DOMA) is unconstitutional. As a result of the Supreme Court’s decision, the United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM) will now be able to extend certain benefits to Federal employees and annuitants who have legally married a spouse of the same sex, regardless of the employee’s or annuitant’s state of residency. OPM is currently in the process of updating and revising the website to reflect this change, and will be updating this information as soon a
This Article argues that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is not unconstitutional - at least not y...
In the late 1970s, state legislatures began to amend their antidiscrimination laws to include a proh...
This article explores the important question of who decides when to recognize same-sex marriages, bo...
Another federal judge has now ruled that the provision of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) that pr...
During the brief window in 2008 when the state of California permitted same-sex couples to marry, Ka...
The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) prohibits the recognition of same-sex marriages for any purpose u...
This article is the third in a series on the implications for employee benefit plans of the Supreme ...
In 2013, the Supreme Court changed the lives of thousands of same-sex couples in America by declarin...
The Supreme Court’s two recent decisions ( Windsor and Hollingsworth ) holding that Section 3 of the...
The article focuses on an issue that is shaping up to be the new front in the same-sex marriage wars...
En route to finding the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) an unconstitutional violation of the Fifth Am...
According to the text of the Act, DOMA\u27s purposes are to define and protect the institution of m...
For the purposes of writing a article on same-sex divorce, it became necessary to categorize the var...
[Excerpt] This report discusses The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and legal challenges to it. It re...
As I discussed in Part One of this two-part series of columns for Justia’s Verdict, the new bill wou...
This Article argues that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is not unconstitutional - at least not y...
In the late 1970s, state legislatures began to amend their antidiscrimination laws to include a proh...
This article explores the important question of who decides when to recognize same-sex marriages, bo...
Another federal judge has now ruled that the provision of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) that pr...
During the brief window in 2008 when the state of California permitted same-sex couples to marry, Ka...
The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) prohibits the recognition of same-sex marriages for any purpose u...
This article is the third in a series on the implications for employee benefit plans of the Supreme ...
In 2013, the Supreme Court changed the lives of thousands of same-sex couples in America by declarin...
The Supreme Court’s two recent decisions ( Windsor and Hollingsworth ) holding that Section 3 of the...
The article focuses on an issue that is shaping up to be the new front in the same-sex marriage wars...
En route to finding the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) an unconstitutional violation of the Fifth Am...
According to the text of the Act, DOMA\u27s purposes are to define and protect the institution of m...
For the purposes of writing a article on same-sex divorce, it became necessary to categorize the var...
[Excerpt] This report discusses The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and legal challenges to it. It re...
As I discussed in Part One of this two-part series of columns for Justia’s Verdict, the new bill wou...
This Article argues that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is not unconstitutional - at least not y...
In the late 1970s, state legislatures began to amend their antidiscrimination laws to include a proh...
This article explores the important question of who decides when to recognize same-sex marriages, bo...