The argument from pathos is one of the three normative modes of persuasion in deliberation. The argument from pathos in deliberation serves six functions. It serves as a perceptual capacity; it is a constituent element of deliberative judgment: it communicates importance: it is a powerful motivator: it serves several aesthetic functions, and it is expressive. An examination of the cognitive structure of the emotions reveals the epistemic potential of the emotions. The success conditions necessary for an emotion to grasp its object yields three epistemic results. The apprehension of particular object of an emotion confers salience: the formal object names a quality that conceptually relates the emotion to a normative principle, and the propo...
textRhetoricians have long sought to improve our efforts and capacity to reason together, to achieve...
International audienceIn everyday life discussion, people try to persuade each other about the goodn...
This paper expands Gilbert’s emotional mode of argumentation (1997). First, general concerns with ar...
Simply put, pathos is the use of emotional appeals in argument. The reasons for using pathos include...
In this article emotion and its role in argumentation are presented to propose the use of emotional ...
This paper takes part in the ongoing debate on how emotions can be dealt with by argumentation theor...
The concern for the role of emotion in argumentative encounters has rested upon the concept of emoti...
In a recent paper (ISSA 2010), Groarke proposes a view of emotional arguments that seems too narrow....
Stephen Toulmin’s use of a judicial model for argumentation in The Uses of Argument means that he is...
Over the course of this century, science and technology policy issues such as the management of haza...
Despite much interest in scholarship on affect and emotion in the field of rhetoric and composition ...
Emotion often takes the back seat in contemporary rhetorical investigation, as emotions are treated ...
This thesis addresses whether it is a mistake to limit the traditional conception of argument to tha...
There are emotively powerful words that can modify our judgment, arouse our emotions, and influence ...
There are emotively powerful words that can modify our judgment, arouse our emotions, and influence ...
textRhetoricians have long sought to improve our efforts and capacity to reason together, to achieve...
International audienceIn everyday life discussion, people try to persuade each other about the goodn...
This paper expands Gilbert’s emotional mode of argumentation (1997). First, general concerns with ar...
Simply put, pathos is the use of emotional appeals in argument. The reasons for using pathos include...
In this article emotion and its role in argumentation are presented to propose the use of emotional ...
This paper takes part in the ongoing debate on how emotions can be dealt with by argumentation theor...
The concern for the role of emotion in argumentative encounters has rested upon the concept of emoti...
In a recent paper (ISSA 2010), Groarke proposes a view of emotional arguments that seems too narrow....
Stephen Toulmin’s use of a judicial model for argumentation in The Uses of Argument means that he is...
Over the course of this century, science and technology policy issues such as the management of haza...
Despite much interest in scholarship on affect and emotion in the field of rhetoric and composition ...
Emotion often takes the back seat in contemporary rhetorical investigation, as emotions are treated ...
This thesis addresses whether it is a mistake to limit the traditional conception of argument to tha...
There are emotively powerful words that can modify our judgment, arouse our emotions, and influence ...
There are emotively powerful words that can modify our judgment, arouse our emotions, and influence ...
textRhetoricians have long sought to improve our efforts and capacity to reason together, to achieve...
International audienceIn everyday life discussion, people try to persuade each other about the goodn...
This paper expands Gilbert’s emotional mode of argumentation (1997). First, general concerns with ar...