Add to ORKGIn a recent paper (ISSA 2010), Groarke proposes a view of emotional arguments that seems too narrow. While his notion of pathos and emotional arguments may aid in the development of normative analysis, it is not sufficient in addressing all emotional arguments and is guilty of strictly adhering to the tradition’s conception of emotion’s place in argumentation. I suggest an alternative evaluation of emotional arguments - relying on Walton’s dialogue types and goals as its foundation
This is the author's accepted manuscript. The original publication is available at www.springerlink...
The argument from pathos is one of the three normative modes of persuasion in deliberation. The argu...
The rise of interest in the importance of emotion in argumentation over the last decade, has certain...
In a recent paper (ISSA 2010), Groarke proposes a view of emotional arguments that seems too narrow....
This paper expands Gilbert’s emotional mode of argumentation (1997). First, general concerns with ar...
The prodigious development of argumentation theory over the last three decades has raised many issue...
Why is there resistance in acknowledging emotional arguments? I explore the ambiguity entrenched in ...
This paper takes part in the ongoing debate on how emotions can be dealt with by argumentation theor...
The presence of emotion does not necessarily harm an argument. Emotion can play a role in traditiona...
The question of emotion in argumentation has received considerable attention in recent years. But th...
The concern for the role of emotion in argumentative encounters has rested upon the concept of emoti...
In the context of cornerstone ideas of Western Culture, this paper focuses on the issue of why emoti...
In this article emotion and its role in argumentation are presented to propose the use of emotional ...
This paper summarizes various interpretations of emotional arguments, with a focus on the emotional ...
This thesis addresses whether it is a mistake to limit the traditional conception of argument to tha...
This is the author's accepted manuscript. The original publication is available at www.springerlink...
The argument from pathos is one of the three normative modes of persuasion in deliberation. The argu...
The rise of interest in the importance of emotion in argumentation over the last decade, has certain...
In a recent paper (ISSA 2010), Groarke proposes a view of emotional arguments that seems too narrow....
This paper expands Gilbert’s emotional mode of argumentation (1997). First, general concerns with ar...
The prodigious development of argumentation theory over the last three decades has raised many issue...
Why is there resistance in acknowledging emotional arguments? I explore the ambiguity entrenched in ...
This paper takes part in the ongoing debate on how emotions can be dealt with by argumentation theor...
The presence of emotion does not necessarily harm an argument. Emotion can play a role in traditiona...
The question of emotion in argumentation has received considerable attention in recent years. But th...
The concern for the role of emotion in argumentative encounters has rested upon the concept of emoti...
In the context of cornerstone ideas of Western Culture, this paper focuses on the issue of why emoti...
In this article emotion and its role in argumentation are presented to propose the use of emotional ...
This paper summarizes various interpretations of emotional arguments, with a focus on the emotional ...
This thesis addresses whether it is a mistake to limit the traditional conception of argument to tha...
This is the author's accepted manuscript. The original publication is available at www.springerlink...
The argument from pathos is one of the three normative modes of persuasion in deliberation. The argu...
The rise of interest in the importance of emotion in argumentation over the last decade, has certain...