Monitoring the constitutionality of laws in Finland – Political control rather than judicial control – Understanding why requires a study of historical layers – Evidence that at several historical points certain elemental choices were locked in – Resulting difficulties in later abolishing or changing patterns – Interactive relationship between the political and the legal – Finland’s constitutional past still circumscribes the role of the judiciary in constitutionality controlPeer reviewe
The Nordic countries’ changing constitutional scenery is a largely unexplored paradise for theory bu...
The nature and scope of judicial power lies at the centre of contemporary constitutional debate in m...
Democracy has developed and develops only in so far as the relationship betweenGovernment and the go...
Monitoring the constitutionality of laws in Finland – Political control rather than judicial control...
Traditional characteristics of Nordic constitutionalism have been challenged increasingly, since the...
Nordic Constitutions have both differences and similarities. This chapter explains certain key diffe...
The Supreme Courts in all the Nordic countries reserve, and exercise, the power to set aside unconst...
The Constitution Act of 1919 was replaced in 2000 by a new Constitution, which was amended in 2012. ...
Essays in commemoration of the seventieth birthday of Professor Osanai SatoruModern constitutional l...
The Finnish legal system shows only limited judicial deference to administrative discretion. Instead...
In recent years, the supreme courts in the Nordic countries have set aside statutes as contrary to t...
This chapter discusses the constitutionalisation of Contract law in Finland and makes frequent compa...
The article examines the power of administrative bodies to assess the constitutionality of legislati...
Judicial review is one of the classical issues in constitutional law.1 It is not practiced in every ...
In recent decades, constitutional courts have become essential institutions in the political systems...
The Nordic countries’ changing constitutional scenery is a largely unexplored paradise for theory bu...
The nature and scope of judicial power lies at the centre of contemporary constitutional debate in m...
Democracy has developed and develops only in so far as the relationship betweenGovernment and the go...
Monitoring the constitutionality of laws in Finland – Political control rather than judicial control...
Traditional characteristics of Nordic constitutionalism have been challenged increasingly, since the...
Nordic Constitutions have both differences and similarities. This chapter explains certain key diffe...
The Supreme Courts in all the Nordic countries reserve, and exercise, the power to set aside unconst...
The Constitution Act of 1919 was replaced in 2000 by a new Constitution, which was amended in 2012. ...
Essays in commemoration of the seventieth birthday of Professor Osanai SatoruModern constitutional l...
The Finnish legal system shows only limited judicial deference to administrative discretion. Instead...
In recent years, the supreme courts in the Nordic countries have set aside statutes as contrary to t...
This chapter discusses the constitutionalisation of Contract law in Finland and makes frequent compa...
The article examines the power of administrative bodies to assess the constitutionality of legislati...
Judicial review is one of the classical issues in constitutional law.1 It is not practiced in every ...
In recent decades, constitutional courts have become essential institutions in the political systems...
The Nordic countries’ changing constitutional scenery is a largely unexplored paradise for theory bu...
The nature and scope of judicial power lies at the centre of contemporary constitutional debate in m...
Democracy has developed and develops only in so far as the relationship betweenGovernment and the go...