The existing literature on savings, insurance, and portfolio choices under risk has revealed that quite often comparative statics results depend, among other things, upon the values of the coefficients of relative risk aversion and relative prudence. More specifically the benchmark values for these coefficients are, respectively, one and two. Recently, several papers investigated constraints on the higher degree extensions of the coefficients of relative risk aversion and of relative prudence. The present work provides a unified approach to this question based on the concept of elementary correlation increasing transformations, allowing for a better understanding of changes in risk in the multiplicative case
Risk aversion—but also the higher-order risk preferences of prudence and temperance—are fundamental ...
Abstract This paper analyzes risk attitudes of higher orders, such as prudence and temperance, in mo...
An increase in risk aversion, defined by a concavification of the utility function, does not always ...
The existing literature on savings, insurance, and portfolio choices under risk has revealed that qu...
Higher-order risk attitudes other than risk aversion (e.g., prudence and temperance) play vital role...
In this paper we propose benchmark values for the coefficients of relative risk aversion and relati...
Abstract: In the framework of expected utility, nth-degree risk aversion/loving is unequivocally ch...
Abstract In this paper we propose benchmark values for the coefficients of relative risk aversion an...
In this paper we apply to multiplicative lotteries the idea of preference for “harm disaggregation” ...
The notion of (additive) risk apportionment introduced by Eeckhoudt and Schlesinger (2006) is a pref...
We study comparative statics of Nth-degree risk increases, as de ned by Ekern (1980), within a large...
This paper examines the effects of higher-order risk attitudes and statistical moments on the optima...
Risk aversion (a second-order risk preference) is a time-proven concept in economic models of choice...
We study comparative statics of Nth-degree risk increases within a large class of problems that invo...
A large strand of research has identified conditions on preferences under which (i) a single risk is...
Risk aversion—but also the higher-order risk preferences of prudence and temperance—are fundamental ...
Abstract This paper analyzes risk attitudes of higher orders, such as prudence and temperance, in mo...
An increase in risk aversion, defined by a concavification of the utility function, does not always ...
The existing literature on savings, insurance, and portfolio choices under risk has revealed that qu...
Higher-order risk attitudes other than risk aversion (e.g., prudence and temperance) play vital role...
In this paper we propose benchmark values for the coefficients of relative risk aversion and relati...
Abstract: In the framework of expected utility, nth-degree risk aversion/loving is unequivocally ch...
Abstract In this paper we propose benchmark values for the coefficients of relative risk aversion an...
In this paper we apply to multiplicative lotteries the idea of preference for “harm disaggregation” ...
The notion of (additive) risk apportionment introduced by Eeckhoudt and Schlesinger (2006) is a pref...
We study comparative statics of Nth-degree risk increases, as de ned by Ekern (1980), within a large...
This paper examines the effects of higher-order risk attitudes and statistical moments on the optima...
Risk aversion (a second-order risk preference) is a time-proven concept in economic models of choice...
We study comparative statics of Nth-degree risk increases within a large class of problems that invo...
A large strand of research has identified conditions on preferences under which (i) a single risk is...
Risk aversion—but also the higher-order risk preferences of prudence and temperance—are fundamental ...
Abstract This paper analyzes risk attitudes of higher orders, such as prudence and temperance, in mo...
An increase in risk aversion, defined by a concavification of the utility function, does not always ...