Learning models predict that the relative speed at which players in a game adjust their behavior has a critical influence on long term behavior. In an ultimatum game, the prediction is that proposers learn not to make small offers faster than responders learn not to reject them. We experimentally test whether relative speed of learning has the predicted effect, by manipulating the amount of experience accumulated by proposers and responders. The experiment allows the predicted learning by responders to be observed, for the first time
Evolutionary accounts have difficulty explaining why people cooperate with anonymous strangers they ...
Experimental data for two types of bargaining games are used to study the role of strategic risk in ...
<div><p>Evolutionary accounts have difficulty explaining why people cooperate with anonymous strange...
Learning models predict that the relative speed at which players in a game adjust their behavior has...
Focusing on responder behavior, we report panel data findings from both low and high stakes ultimatu...
Whether behavior converges toward rational play or fair play in repeated ultimatum games depends on ...
Adaptive learning and punishment are highly prominent competing explanations for ultimatum game beha...
We demonstrate that one should not expect convergence of the proposals to the subgame perfect Nash e...
This paper studies the response times of experimental subjects playing the Ultimatum game in a labor...
In the ultimatum game, two players divide a sum of money. The proposer suggests how to split and the...
This paper studies the response times of experimental subjects playing the Ultimatum game in a labor...
In the ultimatum game, two players divide a sum of money. The proposer suggests how to split and the...
Adaptive learning and a fairness motive we call ‘‘punishment’’ are the basis for two prominent and s...
Utilizing the well-known Ultimatum Game, this note presents the following phenomenon. If we start ...
We study persuasion effects in experimental ultimatum games and find that Proposers' payoffs signifi...
Evolutionary accounts have difficulty explaining why people cooperate with anonymous strangers they ...
Experimental data for two types of bargaining games are used to study the role of strategic risk in ...
<div><p>Evolutionary accounts have difficulty explaining why people cooperate with anonymous strange...
Learning models predict that the relative speed at which players in a game adjust their behavior has...
Focusing on responder behavior, we report panel data findings from both low and high stakes ultimatu...
Whether behavior converges toward rational play or fair play in repeated ultimatum games depends on ...
Adaptive learning and punishment are highly prominent competing explanations for ultimatum game beha...
We demonstrate that one should not expect convergence of the proposals to the subgame perfect Nash e...
This paper studies the response times of experimental subjects playing the Ultimatum game in a labor...
In the ultimatum game, two players divide a sum of money. The proposer suggests how to split and the...
This paper studies the response times of experimental subjects playing the Ultimatum game in a labor...
In the ultimatum game, two players divide a sum of money. The proposer suggests how to split and the...
Adaptive learning and a fairness motive we call ‘‘punishment’’ are the basis for two prominent and s...
Utilizing the well-known Ultimatum Game, this note presents the following phenomenon. If we start ...
We study persuasion effects in experimental ultimatum games and find that Proposers' payoffs signifi...
Evolutionary accounts have difficulty explaining why people cooperate with anonymous strangers they ...
Experimental data for two types of bargaining games are used to study the role of strategic risk in ...
<div><p>Evolutionary accounts have difficulty explaining why people cooperate with anonymous strange...