This article examines the new model for corporate officer liability under section 144 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (Vic), and explores the extent to which this might effectively extend responsibility for OHS offences to members of corporate groups, such as holding companies. In doing so, the authors canvass the failure of corporate law to impose such obligations on corporate officers in general, and on holding companies as shadow officers. It is argued that provisions such as section 144 of the Victorian Act should be included in all OHS legislation
In a 2001 Issues Paper entitled \u27Sentencing: Corporate Offenders\u27, the New South Wales Law Ref...
The Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 (NSW) (OHS Act) has the goal of securing and promoting t...
Something is missing from Title VII - a modern and fully functional theory of direct employer liabil...
Section 26 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 (NSW) (like similar provisions in other Au...
Section 26 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 (NSW) (like similar provisions in other Au...
[Conclusion] We have explored two dimensions of the Australian OHS statutes which enable statutory O...
This paper examines the concept of corporate liability in the context of occupational health and saf...
This paper considers the question of whether it is possible for company officers, who are fixed with...
Occupational health and safety is an increasingly important aspect of management and to the role of ...
Health and safety at work remains a serious and under-recognised problem in Australia. This paper ar...
Masters Research - Master of Laws (LLM)Workplace-related death, injuries and illness remain a major ...
A suggested approach to improving workplace safety in the corporate context is to address the person...
The two Reports of the National Review into Model Occupational Health and Safety Laws (the First Rep...
The board of directors provides overall strategic direction for the company. Generally directors are...
AbstractThe demise of several high profile corporations worldwide has reinforced the importance of s...
In a 2001 Issues Paper entitled \u27Sentencing: Corporate Offenders\u27, the New South Wales Law Ref...
The Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 (NSW) (OHS Act) has the goal of securing and promoting t...
Something is missing from Title VII - a modern and fully functional theory of direct employer liabil...
Section 26 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 (NSW) (like similar provisions in other Au...
Section 26 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 (NSW) (like similar provisions in other Au...
[Conclusion] We have explored two dimensions of the Australian OHS statutes which enable statutory O...
This paper examines the concept of corporate liability in the context of occupational health and saf...
This paper considers the question of whether it is possible for company officers, who are fixed with...
Occupational health and safety is an increasingly important aspect of management and to the role of ...
Health and safety at work remains a serious and under-recognised problem in Australia. This paper ar...
Masters Research - Master of Laws (LLM)Workplace-related death, injuries and illness remain a major ...
A suggested approach to improving workplace safety in the corporate context is to address the person...
The two Reports of the National Review into Model Occupational Health and Safety Laws (the First Rep...
The board of directors provides overall strategic direction for the company. Generally directors are...
AbstractThe demise of several high profile corporations worldwide has reinforced the importance of s...
In a 2001 Issues Paper entitled \u27Sentencing: Corporate Offenders\u27, the New South Wales Law Ref...
The Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 (NSW) (OHS Act) has the goal of securing and promoting t...
Something is missing from Title VII - a modern and fully functional theory of direct employer liabil...