In this paper a Developer contracts with a Researcher for the production of a non-drastic innovation. Since effort is non-contractible, the Developer offers an incentive contract dependent on the observed magnitude of the innovation. It is shown that the distribution of intellectual property rights (IPR) ownership does not affect the level of effort exerted for innovations where the Developer would choose to license the innovation to its competitors. This is because the possibility of leakage of the innovation through licensing subsidies the Developer's payment when IPR is delegated to the Researcher, while at the same time eroding its profit
We analyse the effect of grantback clauses in licensing contracts. While competition authorities fea...
This paper models the disclosure of knowledge via licensing to outsiders or fringe firms as a threat...
This paper develops an incomplete contract model of the licensing relationship to analyze the dynami...
In this paper a Developer contracts with a Researcher for the production of a non-drastic innovation...
We analyze the contract between an innovator and a developer, when the former has private informatio...
We analyze licensing contracts between informed innovators and developers exerting profit-increasing...
We analyze licensing contracts between informed innovators and developers exerting profit-increasing...
Intellectual property rights are legal constraints that limit entry in industries where incumbents a...
This paper examines the licensing of an innovation—by a patent holder to one or more users—when the ...
We consider a policy regime allowing academic institutions to grant industry the intellectual proper...
Previous literature has mostly considered R&D and licensing activities separately. In this paper we ...
This paper uses a three-stage licensing-delegation-quantity game to study the licensing of a cost-re...
We study various modes of technology transfer of an outside innovator in a spatial framework when th...
Inventors can commercialize innovative products by themselves and simultaneously license the techno...
We study how innovators can optimally design licensing contracts when there is incomplete informatio...
We analyse the effect of grantback clauses in licensing contracts. While competition authorities fea...
This paper models the disclosure of knowledge via licensing to outsiders or fringe firms as a threat...
This paper develops an incomplete contract model of the licensing relationship to analyze the dynami...
In this paper a Developer contracts with a Researcher for the production of a non-drastic innovation...
We analyze the contract between an innovator and a developer, when the former has private informatio...
We analyze licensing contracts between informed innovators and developers exerting profit-increasing...
We analyze licensing contracts between informed innovators and developers exerting profit-increasing...
Intellectual property rights are legal constraints that limit entry in industries where incumbents a...
This paper examines the licensing of an innovation—by a patent holder to one or more users—when the ...
We consider a policy regime allowing academic institutions to grant industry the intellectual proper...
Previous literature has mostly considered R&D and licensing activities separately. In this paper we ...
This paper uses a three-stage licensing-delegation-quantity game to study the licensing of a cost-re...
We study various modes of technology transfer of an outside innovator in a spatial framework when th...
Inventors can commercialize innovative products by themselves and simultaneously license the techno...
We study how innovators can optimally design licensing contracts when there is incomplete informatio...
We analyse the effect of grantback clauses in licensing contracts. While competition authorities fea...
This paper models the disclosure of knowledge via licensing to outsiders or fringe firms as a threat...
This paper develops an incomplete contract model of the licensing relationship to analyze the dynami...