Add to ORKGI. Introduction II. Subsequent Remedial Measures and Product Liability Theory ... A. Policies Underlying Federal Rule 407 and Similar State Rules ... B. Product Liability Theories and Underlying Policies ... C. Subsequent Remedial Measures and Tort Theories—Recognizing the Difference III. Reviewing the Case Law IV. Admissibility of Evidence of Subsequent Remedial Measures in Nebraska V. Conclusio
This note will begin by examining the legal theories involved in merging the concepts of comparative...
A cornerstone of tort law in our Anglo-American system of jurisprudence is that liability is imposed...
Rule 407 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, the “Subsequent Remedial Measures” Rule, is troubling. Th...
I. Introduction II. Subsequent Remedial Measures and Product Liability Theory ... A. Policies Underl...
The law of products Iiability has undergone a dramatic evolution since MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co....
This Article compares the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability with Minnesota products l...
The Nebraska Supreme Court in Kohler v. Ford Motor Co. held that a manufacturer was strictly liable ...
This article will briefly review the traditional principles of corporate law governing the assumptio...
The authors discuss recent developments in Florida law in the area of products liability. The distin...
Products liability and comparative negligence are two very rapidly developing fields of tort law. In...
This Comment will discuss the inability of tort law to provide an adequate solution to this issue, a...
Before the Greenman decision in 1963, a plaintiff in a products liability case had to rely on the th...
In the common law provinces of Canada, it is generally recognized that a plaintiff in a products lia...
Federal Rule of Evidence 407 prohibits the introduction of subsequent remedial measures for the purp...
This note will begin by examining the legal theories involved in merging the concepts of comparative...
This note will begin by examining the legal theories involved in merging the concepts of comparative...
A cornerstone of tort law in our Anglo-American system of jurisprudence is that liability is imposed...
Rule 407 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, the “Subsequent Remedial Measures” Rule, is troubling. Th...
I. Introduction II. Subsequent Remedial Measures and Product Liability Theory ... A. Policies Underl...
The law of products Iiability has undergone a dramatic evolution since MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co....
This Article compares the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability with Minnesota products l...
The Nebraska Supreme Court in Kohler v. Ford Motor Co. held that a manufacturer was strictly liable ...
This article will briefly review the traditional principles of corporate law governing the assumptio...
The authors discuss recent developments in Florida law in the area of products liability. The distin...
Products liability and comparative negligence are two very rapidly developing fields of tort law. In...
This Comment will discuss the inability of tort law to provide an adequate solution to this issue, a...
Before the Greenman decision in 1963, a plaintiff in a products liability case had to rely on the th...
In the common law provinces of Canada, it is generally recognized that a plaintiff in a products lia...
Federal Rule of Evidence 407 prohibits the introduction of subsequent remedial measures for the purp...
This note will begin by examining the legal theories involved in merging the concepts of comparative...
This note will begin by examining the legal theories involved in merging the concepts of comparative...
A cornerstone of tort law in our Anglo-American system of jurisprudence is that liability is imposed...
Rule 407 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, the “Subsequent Remedial Measures” Rule, is troubling. Th...