Products liability and comparative negligence are two very rapidly developing fields of tort law. In recent years, the vast majority of courts have adopted strict liability for harm caused by defective products. At the same time, the doctrine of comparative negligence has changed almost overnight from a doctrine that had been accepted by only a handful of jurisdictions into what is now the majority approach in this country
This article will briefly review the traditional principles of corporate law governing the assumptio...
This article examines the relationship between two concepts found throughout the law of products lia...
Among industrialized nations, the United States is unique in addressing tort law at the state rather...
Products liability and comparative negligence are two very rapidly developing fields of tort law. In...
A trend is emerging to apply comparative negligence in strict products liability actions. This creat...
This Article will consider the nature of the term defect and the judicial characterization of the st...
The Uniform Comparative Fault Act, drafted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform St...
This note will begin by examining the legal theories involved in merging the concepts of comparative...
This note will begin by examining the legal theories involved in merging the concepts of comparative...
Since the mid-nineteenth century, products liability law has undergone significant modifications. Th...
Products liability law in America has crossed a new threshold. The current trend toward comparative ...
The purpose of this article is not to re-plow the ground of history, case law, and statutory develop...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that comparative negligence concepts should not be extended to s...
In tort cases, comparative negligence now is the dominant method for determining damages. Under that...
In the products liability area the pendulum has now swung back to the imposition of strict liability...
This article will briefly review the traditional principles of corporate law governing the assumptio...
This article examines the relationship between two concepts found throughout the law of products lia...
Among industrialized nations, the United States is unique in addressing tort law at the state rather...
Products liability and comparative negligence are two very rapidly developing fields of tort law. In...
A trend is emerging to apply comparative negligence in strict products liability actions. This creat...
This Article will consider the nature of the term defect and the judicial characterization of the st...
The Uniform Comparative Fault Act, drafted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform St...
This note will begin by examining the legal theories involved in merging the concepts of comparative...
This note will begin by examining the legal theories involved in merging the concepts of comparative...
Since the mid-nineteenth century, products liability law has undergone significant modifications. Th...
Products liability law in America has crossed a new threshold. The current trend toward comparative ...
The purpose of this article is not to re-plow the ground of history, case law, and statutory develop...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that comparative negligence concepts should not be extended to s...
In tort cases, comparative negligence now is the dominant method for determining damages. Under that...
In the products liability area the pendulum has now swung back to the imposition of strict liability...
This article will briefly review the traditional principles of corporate law governing the assumptio...
This article examines the relationship between two concepts found throughout the law of products lia...
Among industrialized nations, the United States is unique in addressing tort law at the state rather...