Add to ORKGThe United States Supreme Court has held that the fourth amendment does not require that a Title III electronic surveillance order include a specific authorization for law enforcement officers to covertly enter the premises described in the order to install a listening device. Dalia v. United States, 441 U.S. 238 (1979
The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution states that The right of the people to be se...
As a preliminary to deportation proceedings, defendant, Rudolf I. Abel, was arrested in his hotel ro...
There was probable cause to believe that defendant Scandifia was implicated in a larceny of jewelry ...
Despite the critical examination to which many sections of Title III have been subjected, section 25...
Courts Split on the Necessity of Separate Authorization for a Covert Entry Under Title III of the Om...
Despite the critical examination to which many sections of Title III have been subjected, section 25...
The United States Supreme Court has held that the installation and use of a pen register device is n...
This article addresses the problems raised by the Title III minimization requirement with particular...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a search incident to a valid arrest for a traffic viol...
Recorded bribe attempt admissible at bribery trial at which agent, to whom the attempted bribe was m...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that evidence seized pursuant to a...
The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution states that The right of the people to be se...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that a warrantless search and seizure, if authorized...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that there is a federal cause of action founded dire...
The United States Supreme Court has been struggling for four decades with the problem of applying th...
The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution states that The right of the people to be se...
As a preliminary to deportation proceedings, defendant, Rudolf I. Abel, was arrested in his hotel ro...
There was probable cause to believe that defendant Scandifia was implicated in a larceny of jewelry ...
Despite the critical examination to which many sections of Title III have been subjected, section 25...
Courts Split on the Necessity of Separate Authorization for a Covert Entry Under Title III of the Om...
Despite the critical examination to which many sections of Title III have been subjected, section 25...
The United States Supreme Court has held that the installation and use of a pen register device is n...
This article addresses the problems raised by the Title III minimization requirement with particular...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a search incident to a valid arrest for a traffic viol...
Recorded bribe attempt admissible at bribery trial at which agent, to whom the attempted bribe was m...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that evidence seized pursuant to a...
The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution states that The right of the people to be se...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that a warrantless search and seizure, if authorized...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that there is a federal cause of action founded dire...
The United States Supreme Court has been struggling for four decades with the problem of applying th...
The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution states that The right of the people to be se...
As a preliminary to deportation proceedings, defendant, Rudolf I. Abel, was arrested in his hotel ro...
There was probable cause to believe that defendant Scandifia was implicated in a larceny of jewelry ...